Personal de-conversion testimonials submitted to ExChristian.Net

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Sent in by Steel

At 40 years old, I have lived some 25 years as a "born again" Christian, but have really struggled for the last 10 years years with what I see as a creator, who by all logical exercises, is an absentee landlord. For example:

- I cannot say that I ever had any prayer answered for my own needs, or those of others

- I have sought the healing for my many physical problems, with faith, for the healing that was promised me as a believer (even just a portion), but it was all in vain

- I have really struggled with inescapable statistics, such as:

1/3 of the world is under-fed, 1/3 is starving (The World Health Organization); every year 15 million children die of hunger; 3 out of every 4 who die from starvation are younger than 5 years old; every 3.6 seconds someone dies of hunger

- Does God really reward faith? (“But without faith it is impossible to please him. For he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him - Hebrews 11:16). I find it hard to say yes. Ask the millions of soldiers and civilians dead in WWII alone – how many millions prayed with an immovable faith only to be rewarded with death or death of loved ones and destruction of their lands and economies?

- Why would faith be a prerequisite anyway? Ask the millions of starving children who cry out to him in innocence each day and are ignored. If my 7-year old were struggling with needs, I would not sit on my hands till he demonstrated some arbitrary level of faith. Why would the Creator?

- It is astonishing how many wars and deaths in general, were performed in God’s name (be it Hebrew, Christian, Muslim, Jedi, or whatever flavor). With Mankind as his children, why no intervention in such matters to dispel the confusion and provide relief?

Does God hear prayers? Does he answer prayer? Some contend that the only logical conclusion is: if he hears prayer, he ignores them, making him indescribably cold and sadistic. I feel a more palatable and logical conclusion, from detached observations, is that he simply refuses to hear from mankind or intervene in our affairs (or at least, in a most minimalistic way, only in unpredictable, isolated occasions and/or via semi-earthbound (possibly arbitrary) guardian angels).

- scriptural inconsistencies and downright illogical oddities (that is another thread)

This grieves me to no end to reveal these thoughts.

Well, at any rate, unrelated...here is a compilation I made, a curiosity, an academic exercise, from various sources, that may be of interest. It lists examples of the "Dying and Rising God" principal (a cornerstone of Christianity) and other biblical events/Christian tenents, which can be seen in various way in pagan belief systems. Idea of sacrifical redemption, baptism, resurrection, et cetera, are found in pagan religions, predating Christian doctrine:

1. Example: Osiris

- Egyptian of life, death, and fertility (called the All-Father)

- He is the resurrection figure, the is the oldest son of the Earth god, Geb, and the sky goddess, Nut

- He was killed by his evil brother, Set, then was resurrected.

- Osiris's wife, Isis, found his remains embedded in a tree trunk

- These ancients celebrated a eucharist. It was believed that humans were whatever they eat and that this Osirian

sacrament was able to make them celestial and immortal (earliest roots were in prehistoric cannibal tribes,

who held that the virtues and powers of the eaten would thus be absorbed by the eater).

2. Example: Mithras

- Roman solar deity (2nd Century BC – 5th Century AD)

- The name Mithras is the Greek masculine form of the Persian god Mithra, who was the mediator between

the God (“Ahura Mazda”) and the Earth.

- Referred to by followers as Redeemer, "the light of the world", and "The Good Shepherd,"

- Exhorted his followers to share ritual communion meals of bread and wine.

- His priests were called "Father"

- Mithras was born with shepherds in attendance, on the 25th of December (a date chosen by early church

fathers to honor Christ’s birth so as to not attract attention)

3. Example: Attis

- Pre-Christian Greek solar-vegetation deity

- Born in December

- Referred to as "The lamb of God,"

- Was crucified and subsequent resurrection were celebrated annually, with ritual communions of bread and

wine.

- His virgin mother, Cybele, was worshipped as "The Queen of heaven."

- Attis and Cybele's predecessors are the Babylonian Goddess Ishtar, and her consort Tammuz. It is from their

legend that we get the name for the annual celebration of the resurrection of Christ…”Easter”, a name of the

Goddess Ishtar

- Tammuz is associated with a symbol- the cross [early Christian used the Greek letter, “X” as a parallel symbol (named “christos”)]

4. Example: Odin

- Head of Nordic gods (“Father of All”)

- Odin hangs from a tree as a sacrifice to himself and was pierced in the side by his own javelin.

- He hung for nine days and nights, in order to learn the wisdom that would give him power in the nine worlds.

(sacrifices, human or otherwise, to the gods were commonly hung in or from trees, often pierced by spears)

5. Example: Baldur

- Nordic “god of light”, innocence, beauty, joy, purity, and peace, Odin's second son

- Killed by the Loki, scheming deity (who fathered various beasts, humans, and monsters)

- He will returns after Ragnarok (end of the world good vs. evil battle of the gods…comparable to the Christian Apocalypse) to usher in an era of peace.

6. Example: Dionysus

- Greek god of the wine

- Was born from a virgin mother, a mortal woman, but fathered by the King of Heaven

- Transformed water into wine,

- He incurred the wrath of the religious authorities, who were appalled that he refers to himself as a son

of god.

- He allows himself to be arrested and tried for blasphemy - a willing self-sacrifice.

- He is found guilty and executed, only to rise from the grave three days later, where the women weeping

at his tomb do not recognize him until he assumes his divine form

- Was thought of as a liberator of mankind.

- Notions of eating and drinking "the flesh" and "blood" were popularized by the cult of Dionysus.

Thanks for indulging me.

To monitor comments posted to this topic, use .
 
Comments:
Anonymous Anonymous said...
It's a good post but I really do doubt it was written by a born again Christian. This is just too polished to be written from the heart. This is a solid atheist perspective. Sorry , but thats the impression I'm getting as I read it.


Blogger sailerfraud said...
More reality grievances of religion.

Despite all the lying preachers claiming humans are inherently evil and need religion to revert to the good side, reality is different.

Crime rates by Christians, including murder, rape, fraud, assult, and dirt factor rates like divorce and alcholism, are equal to the non-Christian population at best. All too often is gets even worse in the Christian population.


Blogger sailerfraud said...
You also have to face reality on the power of prayer. While you were praying to the almighty God for healing, such as from a disease, ailment, or social problem, the reality is that you could be praying to another god, or even a tree or rock, and recieve the same results.

I covered this a while back.

Logical Proof that God doesn't exist - Prayer

If God is so good and powerful, why does evil exist?


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Serious illness is a severe threat to one's atheistic sanity. I had the experience of some serious waiting for a kidney transplant. Wife and other relatives and friends kept praying for me, and for a few months, I even relented on my all-my-adulthood atheism, reverting a little to the faith of my upbringing. Then, the kidney transplant came, and all I kept hearing was how thankful we should all be to god. I waivered a little, but then I gradually found out that within a few weeks or months, most of the other people who had been waiting about as long as I had also got their kidney... and so, now I'm back to reality, having realized that it was just the luck of the draw, and the right amount of patient waiting. I guess if god gave me the kidney, he had to take the donor's life in order to do it, and he also had to give me kidney failure to beging with. He could have saved everyone a lot of trouble.


Blogger Telmi said...
Good philosophy, Steel.

I enjoyed reading the post.


Blogger twincats said...
Hey, anonymous - Glad to hear you got the kidney you needed! As a family member of a donor (brother-in-law had a fatal stroke last summer) I can tell you that we were all very glad and thankful (to the hospital and teams it took to coordinate and harvest, not any god) that his death could benefit others in need and not be in vain. It's really been a great comfort to all of us.

Sure, we miss him but the fact that several people's lives were saved (kidneys) or improved (corneas, skin) is no small thing.

Thanks to medical science and the dedicated people who coordinate the organ donor program!

p.s. I hope we're all registered as organ donors!


Anonymous Anonymous said...
There are arouund 20 crucified Christs before the time of Jesus,most with the same stories.

Virgin birth,miracles,persecution,
killed by authorities to rise from the grave and appear to followers.

If Jesus was the real thing, why would he copy all of these previous so called messiahs?

Me thinks he would distance himself from,(not copy)these so called "sons of god".

freedy


Blogger MikeG said...
I prefer to see from a different perspective. I also have lived over 25 years (closer to 30) as a born-again Christian. I have come to accept the fact that the Gospel is 'The Greatest Story Ever Told' in the sense that it is indeed a story.

It is a very beautiful story that is used to communicate divine spiritual truths, while the story itself is not historically factual and true. It is a very profound means of expressing the inexpressible. Who can put into words the understanding of the God of Heaven Who transcends human understanding. The Gospel is a means of doing that in some measure. God so loves and identifies with man that He becomes incarnate in the flesh, and through His death and Resurrection triumphs over death, and opens a door to eternal life—life after physical death. There is an abundance of virtue and Godly character imparted to the believer through faith in Christ.

I don't regret one bit the years in which I have lived by faith in Christ. When I consider the times I have been disappointed or hurt by the failures of others, I can consider the fact that that I too fall short of perfection. That does not change the goodness or faithfulness of God.

I believe that my life has been immeasurably enriched spiritually by the Gospel through the exhortations to mercy, kindness, patience, love, righetousness, peace, truth, etc., etc., and the revelation of the mercy and forgiveness and love of God.

So, I will not let bitterness find a foothold in me, but will with gratitude and an ongoing love of the truth go forward in life. As the Scripture says that the law was a tutor to bring us to Christ, I can also say that Christ was a tutor to bring us to the love of the truth.


Anonymous Anonymous said...
MikeG,That all sounds great,but what about the billions of us who don't believe and are not bitter and very happy?

Will you you peacefully walk the streets of gold knowing your "good news messiah" is torturing them for eternity in hell?

peace freedy


Blogger MikeG said...
anonymous, The post that started this thread begins, "It grieves me to no end...", which sounds to me like it has some flavor of bitterness. You may have not very well read my post, but I believe that I was clearly enough saying that while I can accept and appreciate the fact that the Gospel is not historically true, I can also appreciate the fact that it communicates many divine truths and virtues which are desirable. How you would use that as a basis for your comment makes no sense to me. And if you just want to argue, I'm not interested.


Blogger boomSLANG said...
Question: Wouldn't it/doesn't it cause one to suspend logical thinking to conclude that a "Divine" being; an omnipotent and omniscient "God"; the creator of the entire Universe, would dictate it's wishes for humankind, um, "half-assed"?.. for lack of a better term?

The bible is either the inerrant inspired "Word of God", or it isn't. If parts of the bible are admittedly not up to par with what one would expect from a "Divine" and "ALL-knowing" being, who's to say that ANY of it is?

Furthermore, many of these "Divine Truths" and "virtues" are merely common sense, and yet, others are out-dated; out-moded; impractical; obsolete.... and just plain silly. Further still, even Christians cannot agree on what is "parable" and what is "gospel", which causes a divisiveness even amongst Christians.

"God inspired"?.. "unchanging"?... "objective Truth" for alll of humanity? Naaw, I don't think so.


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Mikeg,I've never heard of a born again xtian that does not believe the bible to historically accurate,please explain.
Do you not believe the born again experiance to be supernatural? If so than I agree.
What about hell,judgement,miracles etc,....do you believe in these things?

peace,..freedy


Anonymous Dave8 said...
MikeG: "When I consider the times I have been disappointed or hurt by the failures of others, I can consider the fact that that I too fall short of perfection. That does not change the goodness or faithfulness of God."

1-Can you explain your ideal of human perfection?

2-If you aren't perfect, then all your claims aren't perfect either. So, why should anyone believe you when you imperfectly suggest anything about your idealistically perfect God; specifically in regard to goodness and faithfulness?


Blogger MikeG said...
Hey guys, I'm not interested in getting involved in a pissing match. Way better things to do. You can have it out among yourselves.


Anonymous Anonymous said...
MikeG,

They aren't wanting a pissing match. You come in and make some claims and don't back them up with anything substantial. They are calling you on it. You're not used to that are you?

So, you have time to come in and say you don't want to have a pissing match. They also makes me believe you have the time to answer their questions. Me thinks you don't answer their comments and questions because you do NOT have good answers for them. It's much easier to come back and say you don't want to have a pissing match. How convenient for you.


Anonymous Anonymous said...
MikeG: "Hey guys, I'm not interested in getting involved in a pissing match. Way better things to do. You can have it out among yourselves."

So, you've got to piss and run. That’s pretty rude, but consider the favor returned, need a hanky? You can wipe your virtual face off with all that free time.


Blogger boomSLANG said...
With all this talk of "piss", which, BTW, the Christian right would be foaming at the mouth if such a word were mentioned in any secular literature, let's have a look at this verse:

"But Rabshakeh said, Hath my master sent me to thy master and to thee to speak these words? [hath he] not [sent me] to the men that sit upon the wall, that they may eat their own dung, and drink their own piss with you?" II Kings 18:27 KJ

Anyone---where is the "Divinity" and/or "virtue" in such words?

(if you have the time, of course)


Anonymous Anonymous said...
So, the truth comes out. MikeG is hording his own piss, for religious re-enactment purposes.

Hey, MikeG, you can keep the virtual hanky, and at least be considerate enough to wipe the corners of your mouth when you’ve drained your bedpan, bon appetite.


Anonymous Anonymous said...
This grieves me to no end to reveal the picture of MikeG on his back, on a wikipedia page. He's truly something to behold.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urophagia


Blogger Telmi said...
Mikeg,

"God so loves and identifies with man that He becomes incarnate in the flesh, and through His death and Resurrection triumphs over death, and opens a door to eternal life—life after physical death. There is an abundance of virtue and Godly character imparted to the believer through faith in Christ"

Mikeg, you are an ignorant God-sucker. You obviously are not aware of the portrayal of your God as a malevolent,insane,genocidal maniac. Please read the Bible before coming here to spout your crap about "God so loves...".

If you hold that "the story itself is not historically factual and true", then why are you believing in it?

Personal sentiments?


Anonymous MadWorld said...
"But Rabshakeh said, Hath my master sent me to thy master and to thee to speak these words? [hath he] not [sent me] to the men that sit upon the wall, that they may eat their own dung, and drink their own piss with you?" II Kings 18:27 KJ

Clearly then, Urophagia was already fashionable in OT times and I guess that our Mike G finds this a virtue that as a born again Cretin must be upheld %)


Blogger Nvrgoingbkeither said...
HEY STEEL,
I CAN FEEL YA AFTER MY WIFE OPENED MY EYES TOO THE TRUTH I WAS STUNNED AS WELL. I FELT MOSTLY BETRAYED AND AFTER A LIFE LIKE MINE IT'S VERY HARD FOR ANYTHING TOO DO THAT AS BAD AS XIANITY DID.
I REALLY ENJOYED YOUR POST,I FELT IT WAS VERY GEUINE.

I MYSELF SPENT SOME YEARS WITH THE XIAN GOD OF DECEPTION AND BULLSHIT.


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Steel, I enjoyed your post. It's always refreshing to hear or read when someone frees themselves from religious beliefs. Welcome to the world of reality. It's the best way to live. Jim Earl


Anonymous Pull The Other One! said...
MikeG (if you're still here),

You say that the story is 'not historically factual and true', but you're still putting your faith in it.

It seems to me that you're one of quite a number of people who like the idea of Christianity so much that you're willing to jump through all kinds of ridiculous hoops (that you know very well are ridiculous), just so you can sign up.

If you were on a jury, and a witness was caught several times claiming things that were not true, wouldn't you reject the whole testimony?

And shouldn't the gospel writers be more reliable than an ordinary witness in court? Isn't it more important in this particular case that they be completely honest?

But the gospel writers have also been caught out under cross-examination - altering geneologies, twisting and changing Old Testament prophesies (and non-prophesies), blindly following their own interpretations of those verses even when they don't make sense (i.e. Matthew's two donkeys - 21:1-8), and contradicting each others' 'evidence', like witnesses in court whose stories quickly begin to unravel when subject to comparison.

It claims to be the Truth!, not simply a nice story.


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Steel, I also enjoyed your post. It has always been a point of contention for me to physically observe local and global human existence with the belief that an all powerful deity could possibly be doing the same without absolute intervention. No matter the crhistian defense of such atrocities, as you said, I could never think of hurting or allowing harm to come to my own child in any way. This fact is an ongoing theme that play’s itself out throughout all of nature. If it’s good enough for most animals and we that are “designed in his image”, then why is the simple concept not good enough for a god? Like everything christian, it just does not add up.
Then you take the flagrant fact that the christian myth has been plagiarized from preexisting writings................... pardon me, I had to vomit.

MikeG - I don’t feel the need to argue with you. You have more than proven your point. I’m glad that you accept that the bible is not based in historical fact. However, in a moment of shear stupidity, you would still postulate the existence of a god. This is were you invite retribution from us. If you can’t handle it, then quit crying.

Noell


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Yeah, MikeG's post was cowardly to say the least. I spent most of my life following Christianity (41yrs old now). I am not without some belief, however I will never again except something without questioning it. The more I look into Christianity the more I doubt it. I enjoy reason and logical thinking much more than religion or spiritual thinking. Too many people put their beliefs before reason. The world would be a better place if people were reasonable and respectful.

Bill J.

P.S.

The truth is....pain has a way of making you see the truth!!!


Anonymous speedcat said...
Hello, and about the familiar myth about dying gods, I thought I would share this:

The Aztecs tell a story about a god that challenged all the hot young warriors to wrestling matches. Day after day, he defeated all who came in response, and finally he laughed and mocked them, and said, "Is this the best you have?"

At that point, the youngest and greenest of the youth strutted forward and told the god that he was going to kick his ass.

The god sneered, and the youth threw the god onto the ground and kicked the life out of him. He buried his corpse, and from that grave grew the first stalks of corn.


Blogger MikeG said...
This post has been removed by the author.


Blogger MikeG said...
OK, now that all the crybabies have posted their rants, I'll offer a few parting comments on this thread.

For all of you who thought it a huge point for your 'side' that I used the horribly vulgar word 'pissing match', why don't you grow up a bit and look up the expression in a dictionary. Or here, I'll post a dictionary definition for you:

"A confrontational debate; a contest of wills or egos; also called [pissing contest]."

So, to enlighten your ignorance, I used the expression correctly to indicate that I didn't post here to get into a child's play quibble with you over meaningless inaninities. (such as the fact that I used the word 'pissing match', which some of you pounced on like a school of hungry piranhas ready to devour your prey). If that's what you're about, go on and live in your playpen. I won't waste any further time indulging you.

================
"You say that the story is 'not historically factual and true', but you're still putting your faith in it.

"It seems to me that you're one of quite a number of people who like the idea of Christianity so much that you're willing to jump through all kinds of ridiculous hoops (that you know very well are ridiculous), just so you can sign up."
=============

No, I simply understand that it is a story that is used to communicate divine truths. Within it is contained the lofty and desirable virtues of love and mercy and forgiveness and kindness and truthfulness and honesty and faithfulness. It is the story of the triumph of good over evil, of righteousness over depravity, of the spirit over carnality, of life over death. The teaching of the story serves the purpose of exhorting the believer to virtuous living. So, while the story itself may not be historically true, nevertheless there is the higher truth that the story is useful and effective for promoting virtuous living in the believer. That ought to be really simple and easy to understand.


Blogger boomSLANG said...
OK, now that all the crybabies have posted their rants, I'll offer a few parting comments on this thread.

Since you, like all Christians, have not one single shred of objective evidence for your "Divinely inspired virtues"; since your personal belief dead-ends at "I believe".... do you swear on the bible that your comments are "parting" comments?..as in "bye-bye"? That ought be simple enough to understand.


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sorry MikeG,
I've been a Christian for 22 years and I have to break it to you.
Christianity is a religion that makes some very definite historical claims. If these claims are false then Christianity is false and is deserving of all the venom that they pour on it here.
In addition, this site is called ex-christian for a reason. You may not agree with them( many times I don't) but treat them and their discussions with respect. This is their playground, not yours, not mine.
If you cann't abide by the house rules then take your ball and play somewhere else.
Ray


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Steel,

I can appreciate where you come from. Very recently, I had my "aha" moment regarding the absurdities of the bible and religions. My journey started when I wanted to know why many gospels that were written didn't make it to the bible. The more knowledge I acquired by reading and researching has firmly put me on the upexpected path of atheism. The feelings of betrayal will fade. Your new enlightenment hopefully will inspire you to learn more about the fascinating history and truth about organized and unorganized religions. Best of luck to you! It will only get better.


Anonymous speedcat said...
Hello mikeg? Speedcat here.

About your divine truth: we have no need of your divine truth, nor do we recognize your possession of it.

How did you put that drivel? "The triumph of good over evil; of righteousness over depravity; of spirit over carnality". Well mike, keep fighting, because as I read that last 2000 years of history, that finish line is a long way off. You christians fancy that you are involved in some sort of battle, but you are chasing your own tails.

I have been in my own struggle lately: knowledge over ignorance; strength over weakness; freedom over servitude. I am winning.

If the fiction of the bible gives you some comfort, by all means, keep your nose in your holy book. Also of some use is Augustine and Aquinas. If you really want to bugger your mind, go to Calvin. And when and if you turn auto-destructive, go to Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell. Just don't come back here; you'll scare the shit out of us.


Anonymous alanh said...
Mike, do you consider these Bible verses to be useful and effective for promoting virtuous living in the believer?

And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him. Leviticus 24:16

They found a man that gathered sticks upon the sabbath day. ... And the LORD said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones.... And all the congregation brought him without the camp, and stoned him with stones, and he died; as the LORD commanded Moses. Numbers 15:32-56

Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones. -- Psalm 137:9

Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers... -- Isaiah 14:21

Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him -- Proverbs 22:15

If a man be found lying with a woman married to an husband, then they shall both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman, and the woman: so shalt thou put away evil from Israel. -- Deuteronomy 22:22

Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence -- 1 Timothy 2:11-15

"Thou shalt not wear a garment of divers sorts, as of woollen and linen together." -- Deuteronomy 22:11

...it is a shame for women to speak in the church. -- 1 Corinthians 14:34-36


Anonymous Pull The Other One! said...
Mike,

You're making it sound as if you believe that the whole gospel story is some kind of Christian Aesop's fable, or one big parable.

Don't you believe that any of it actually happened? And do you really expect us to believe that the gospel writers weren't attempting to pass off the story as a historical account? (or at least most of it?)

You're an interesting case, I'll give you that, but it's difficult to make out exactly where you're coming from if you're going to be so enigmatic. Let's have a bit more information please.


Blogger MikeG said...
"Don't you believe that any of it actually happened? And do you really expect us to believe that the gospel writers weren't attempting to pass off the story as a historical account? (or at least most of it?)"
================================
Pull, A sincere and honest comment merits a like response.

I suppose that the actual facts are forever lost to history. All that has come down to us are the biblical accounts, which present inescapable difficulties if we try to try to place upon them a literal interpretation. That is obvious to anyone who studies them with any thoroughness. Nevertheless, the widely accepted understanding that the Bible is the infallible, inerrant Word of God persists. I think there are at least a couple of reasons for this.
1. Most people can't or don't study the Bible thoroughly. It is a daunting task for them, and so they are content to believe what they are told to believe.
2. People feel more secure if they can believe that their faith is in something that is absolute and perfect. And so they are willing to accept the 'infallible, inerrant' position because their faith then becomes in a sense 'infallible' and 'inerrant'.
3. At least some of the 'clergy' are content to perpetuate this understanding because they themselves have been taught it, and it is so widely believed, and it gives them more 'control' as the ministers of the 'infallible' and 'inerrant'.

So, what is the actual truth about the origins of the Christian faith? Good question. There evidently was some sort of a messianic Christ figure with a wide reputation and cult following. He's mentioned by Josephus as well as a few other contemporary historians. He may well have been crucified by the Romans as a troublemaker. James Carroll in Constantine's Sword suggests that the Resurrection account may have begun as his followers continued to meet after his death, and through their memories and affection for him seemed to feel as though he were yet present with them. Then as the cult continued and the story developed, it was embellished with passages from the Old Testament that supposedly found their fulfillment in Y'shua (Jesus). In other words, much of the story was created after the fact, using what passages of the Hebrew scriptures (Old Testament) were convenient and would lend Messianic character to it.

Now, having said all that, the didactic nature of the writings bears witness that they were written by people whose desire and intention was to exhort others to uprightness of heart and soul. In other words, they were written to promote the higher character and thus the greater happiness of the readers.

It's for that reason that I prefer to hold them in high regard, rather than to mock and scoff at them, as I see some seem to prefer.


Blogger Lorena said...
MikeG
No, I simply understand that it is a story that is used to communicate divine truths. Within it is contained the lofty and desirable virtues of love and mercy and forgiveness and kindness and truthfulness and honesty and faithfulness. It is the story of the triumph of good over evil, of righteousness over depravity, of the spirit over carnality, of life over death. The teaching of the story serves the purpose of exhorting the believer to virtuous living. So, while the story itself may not be historically true, nevertheless there is the higher truth that the story is useful and effective for promoting virtuous living in the believer. That ought to be really simple and easy to understand.

Lorena responds
Bullshit!
There are better ways to find "Higher Truths" than believing in mythology. Read philosophy. It is more interesting and more true than the Bible. After all, the point of philosophy is to ask questions.


Anonymous Anonymous said...
MikeG,
I accede to your list of reasons as to the bible not being the infallible and inherent word of god. If one would read through the postings of this site one would find the same astute observations have been made by almost ALL of the members here.

I also agree with you on your point that the writings were intended to “exhort” uprightness of heart and soul. And, as you do, I also hold the writers in high regard in at least to the extent that they did not have far to go using other writings as their guideline.

However, I maintain that the bibles’ promotion of higher character and greater happiness has, unfortunately, failed miserably.

Even though it is incredibly flawed, the bible is a well intended work of fiction compiled by ancient humans who borrowed it from previous stories, folklore, and religious writings.The divinity of these writings were extruded from the overactive imagination of humankind. It offers no foundation for the ludicrous possibility of being derived from any manner of truth. The bible as well as ANY other writings from any time period that postulate the existence of a deity, should never be interpreted in the literal sense.

The problem lay in the fact that an insanely large percentage of modern humanity ridiculously choose to believe that the bible is based in truth and that a god does exist!

You seem to find solace in the bible. If your desire is to suggest that there may be some overlying truth to the “knowledge of the unknowable” in the bible and that a higher form of intelligence that we can never understand is at work....................then I say, stupidity is a terrible attribute that you might do well to steer away from.

Your ambiguity remains at large. I suspect that we will never obtain a straight answer from you.


Anonymous alanh said...
MikeG

Your interpretation of the Bible differs from that of the Vatican, and there is nothing definitive to corroborate your version over theirs. The didactic nature of the writings does not mean that what is written is necessarily a good guide to behavior, as the verses I quoted above show. You have a fairly benign view of the Bible, but other Christians have a much more pathological interpretation.


Anonymous Pull The Other One! said...
Mike,

I'm probably in a very different time-zone from you, so I've only just read your response.

It seems that you really do see the gospel story as one big parable.

I find it strange, though, that you still refer to yourself as a 'born-again Christian' (in your first post). I hestitate to stick a label on you, because we often have labels stuck on us, but it really does seem that you're stretching the definition a bit far at the very least!

You wrote that the gospels were 'written by people whose desire and intention was to exhort others to uprightness of heart and soul'.

That may have been part of their intentions, but there was more to it than that. They also didn't hesitate to use threats and intimidation that have marred the lives of many people over the years, including a lot of the regular visitors to this site.

And although the gospel writers may have thought some of the things they were writing were true, they were definitely willing to insert their own inventions as well. For example, 'Mark' must have known that the supposed prophecy of the destruction of the Jewish temple (Mark 13:2) was complete bullshit, even if he didn't come up with it himself.

It seems that you've gone for a religion of your own making, choosing the bits of the bible that you like, while turning a blind eye to the ugly parts.

Some of the comments written in your direction have been rather harsh, but have you ever tried stating your views, as set out here, on a fundamentalist, or even mainstream Christian site? I bet you'd get a far worse reaction!


Blogger Tim said...
Everywhere I look, Christians are spewing the same thing about the "historical" Jesus! The evidence they cite is actually non-existent - much like the Jesus they are trying to buttress with evidence. Take Mike's assertions, for example.

"So, what is the actual truth about the origins of the Christian faith? Good question. There evidently was some sort of a messianic Christ figure with a wide reputation and cult following. He's mentioned by Josephus as well as a few other contemporary historians."

There were MANY messianic or preacher figures during the 1st century but we have no extra-Biblical confirmation whatsoever that there was a Jesus running around proclaiming the kindom of God. Jesus was never mentioned in the original Josephus writings. It was a later insertion into the text by, most likely, Eusebius because no Christian from the 2nd to the 4th century quoted the two displuted passages of which you refer! OMG! These two passages are completely ABSENT until they magically appear in the 4th century. Origen, who quoted from Josephus and who also wrote countless pages of Christian apologetics never ONCE quoted the TF! If the TF had been original to Josephus, there is NO WAY Origen would not have used that against the "heathens".

None of the other historians mention a Jesus by name in the 1st century.


Why do these people keep repeating these lies? Laziness? No time to do the research?

I don't know.


Tim


Blogger Asian Seeker said...
Folks,
I recently started researching on whether the Bible really accepts/ even teaches reincarnation as it was suggested by my son's TCM physician to me, and on doing some google searches, I had an eye-opening experience. I've had difficulties in various parts of the bible eg. who Cain married & who was he afraid would kill him, why the disciples asked Jesus of the man blind from birth who sinned? I've even more issues with inequities of life eg. why God allows/wills certain people from birth to a miserable life...

There are many sources but you might want to check out on writings by JJ Dewey (eg. "Reincarnation and the Bible - one life or many?" and a German writer Jan Erik Sigdell who translated his German book into English titled "Reincarnation, Christianity and the Dogma of the Church" and made it freely available on the internet for download.

I find an existentialist stance simply too unsatisfying, and would like to urge you not to throw the baby out with the bath water when you reject the Christianity as interpreted by dogma but to continue seeking. Anyway, I wish you a fruitful discovery/ recovery... (even if it's) away from organised religion...


Blogger Lorena said...
Asian Seeker said:
you might want to check out on writings by JJ Dewey (eg. "Reincarnation and the Bible - one life or many?" and a German writer Jan Erik Sigdell who translated his German book into English titled "Reincarnation, Christianity and the Dogma of the Church"

Lorena responds

OK, let me see if I understand you correctly.

You believe in reincarnation. And because your interpretation of the Bible validates it, that makes the Bible legitimate?

The belief in reincarnation was widely popular in the times of Jesus. If it is in the Bible is because the book, like all fiction, always includes historical elements of its time.

The book you recommend may be very good, but I already knew the Bible has references to reincarnation, and I still thought the book was fiction.


Blogger Micah Cowan said...
Jesus was never mentioned in the original Josephus writings. It was a later insertion into the text by, most likely, Eusebius because no Christian from the 2nd to the 4th century quoted the two displuted passages of which you refer

I have heard this said a lot, but AFAICT from actual scholarly writings on the subject, it is only generally accepted that the phrase proclaiming him to be the Christ was an insertion (or quite possibly, an ommission, of the phrase "believed to be"). The rest of that reference is, AIUI, generally considered to be original.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus_on_Jesus#Testimonium_Flavianum


Blogger MikeG said...
Pull,

Actually, in my first post I stated that "I have lived over 25 years... as a born-again Christian", which, if you're into precision of language, is in the present perfect tense, which refers to an unspecified time in the past and does not necessarily include the present.

I actually would describe my current status as sort of post-Christian, in the sense that I consider the years I have spent as a Christian as a growing experience which I am now content to move beyond, but without any sort of renunciation or repudiation.

I have probably done a bit more study than most, and have always held in reserve some areas of 'faith' where there were questions to which there were/are no satisfactory answers. I have over the past year or two been able to flesh out my understanding in some of those areas, and am satisfied to go forward with some clarity of mind and good understanding.

But, in going forward, I intend to carry forward with me the fact that I have had many wonderful times and met many wonderful people of faith who were/are 'serving God' to the best of their understanding. I remain united with them in the hope of the eternal life to which the Gospel makes frequent reference.

I have seen and experienced enough evidence of the awesome power of God that I neither would nor could adopt an atheistic point of view. It is simply a matter of understanding God who is greater than the Gospel or than any of the world religions, of which I still think the Gospel is the best.

Add to that the fact that the structure and order of the universe suggests a Designer rather than just random happenstance. From the galaxies and planets in their orbits, to the precision of molecular structures or amino acid sequences or the bonds of the DNA double-helix. These things didn't just happen by accident any more than the watch on your arm that tells you the precise time of day or the car that carries you across the country or the jet that carries you across the ocean came together by accident.

So, who can fathom or describe in words the understanding of the Creator? The Gospel is but one attempt to do that; and I continue to believe that it is a very good one. I am grateful for what I've learned from it, and I hold no malice toward it.


Blogger MikeG said...
Tim, it's admittedly been a long time since I studied Josephus (I've read his complete works, BTW) and the TF, but from what I recall, it is generally accepted that it is at least in part attributable to Josephus. I see that Wikipedia has a pretty good entry that speaks to the question, as well as listing some of the other 'contemporary' (at least very nearly so) witnesses.

And before you go blowing any more smoke, you might consider the fact that there's a likelihood that my studies may very well surpass your own.


Anonymous Anonymous said...
MikeG,....you might be very surprised that there are some learn'd folk 'round here too.


Blogger MikeG said...
"you might be very surprised that there are some learn'd folk 'round here too."
================================
I wouldn't be a bit surprised. In fact, I was sort of hoping there might be. :)


Blogger Astreja said...
MikeG: "Add to that the fact that the structure and order of the universe suggests a Designer rather than just random happenstance. From the galaxies and planets in their orbits, to the precision of molecular structures or amino acid sequences or the bonds of the DNA double-helix. These things didn't just happen by accident any more than the watch on your arm..."

Oh dear, not the tired old "watchmaker" argument yet again.

Mike, when you resort to this rather ineffectual strategy you are committing the logical fallacy of argumentum ad ignorantiam (Argument from ignorance and/or personal incredulity). You cannot prove the existence of a god, designer or indeed anything else by saying that "It's too neat and tidy and organized, therefore some intelligent being must have made it that way on purpose."

Point #1: Even if there were a sentient designer out there, the existence of its "creation" does not uniquely identify the particular god you have chosen.

Point #2: Things that have regular structures, such as the various types of atoms, do tend to aggregate in collections which themselves possess regular structures. This process allows great complexity to come from simplicity.

To test this, put ten pennies on a flat surface and push them together. You can easily create a triangle-like shape, even if that was not your intention. Similarly, you could get seven soft plastic rings and push them together. Don't be surprised if the end result resembles the honeycomb in a beehive.

Point #3: The apparently orderly motion of celestial bodies can be explained quite adequately by various theories of motion and gravitation. If I tie an object to a string and swing it around my head, it will usually travel in a somewhat circular path. Now imagine gravity as the string.

You are correct when you say that various things did not happen "by accident". They happened as a direct result of a much simpler underlying phenomenon or structure.

"Random" vs. "Designed by my god" is a false dichotomy. The universe is not random. I think that it could easily be the accumulation of innumerable small structures into a very large one. I do not see the fingerprints of a designer.


Blogger .:webmaster:. said...
Mike,

If you are walking on the beach and find a watch, you realize the watch is designed because it stands out in stark contrast to the randomness of the beach. And, you know in your mind that nature does not produce watches. Plus, should you desire to do so, you can visit the watch maker in his shop, see how watches are constructed, and if you learn how, you too can make watches. You can test and KNOW that there is a designer for the watch: there he is!

Comparing watches to everything in nature is comparing apples to oranges. They are two different things. The best and most honest thing we can answer to "Where did nature come from" is "I don't know, but the best current theories available indicate this..."

The argument from incredulity (I'm amazed by this, therefore GOD exists) is emotionally appealing to many, but has a huge weakness. The argument assumes a god exists, only because the person arguing simply cannot imagine any other way for nature to exist. This is the argument used by primitive people throughout history to explain every part of nature they couldn't understand. Lightning bolts were thrown by a god. Earthquakes were from a god. Rain comes from a god. Disease comes from demon god. Fertility comes from a god. The list is endless.

Now-a-days we understand that many of the forces attributed to a god in the past are just a part of mindless nature. We can control some things, we can protect ourselves from other things, and we are still at the mercy of quite a number of these forces. However, not too many people think these forces are a god talking to us.

A creationist must simply ASSUME that a god exists. Then the creationist assigns all those things we haven't yet completely puzzled out directly to that god. Then the creationist admits that no one will ever understand how the universe came to be because the secret is secured in the hidden mind of god. So, the creationist leaves of inquiring into the subject to meditate on the mystery of his or her god.

If there is a god that made the world, then we need to study this god: What form of life is it? From where does it generate its power? What materials were used in constructing the universe? Why did it choose to create a universe where big balls of stuff flew around other balls of stuff, where some of those balls violently collide with other balls, where our little blue ball produced life, but that life lives off the deaths of other life forms... etc., etc., etc.

Saying "GOD DID IT" answers absolutely no questions at all. It does, however, make religious people FEEL as if they have answers.



When you see the sand at the beach do you think the arrangement of the sand is designed or random? The destruction caused by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, was that an act of design or just an act of nature?

Really, you can't have it both ways. You can't say, "Well, this is just random nature, but over here... THAT'S DESIGN!


Anonymous anyone else said...
i think if God had really turned His back on us the human violence would be unimaginable. the paranoia and self centeredness would have us looking worse than the most vicious of animals.


Blogger .:webmaster:. said...
anyone else:

You think...

And on what do you base your conclusions, exactly? For instance, on what do you base your conclusions that there is a god? On what do you base your conclusions that this god is benevolent? On what do you base your conclusions that this god is keeping life from being more violent than it is?

Violence is life. Microscopic life forms wage continual battles within our own bodies every minute. The battle these life forms wage is the battle for survival. Every living thing on earth is only able to continue living by eating some other form of life. We all live off the dead carcasses of other life forms. This is the creation of your imagined god.


Anonymous alanh said...
MikeG wrote:

I have seen and experienced enough evidence of the awesome power of God...

So far it sounds like the same evidence that every other believer has, which is a whole lot of wishful thinking. Another Christian that posts here is way ahead of you, he actually produced some photos. If you have something besides the Bible, Josephus and intelligent design then let's hear it.


Blogger MikeG said...
Astreja, Web,

The bottom-line question to which it all boils down is this: Is there an intelligent, sentient, individual being who is responsible for creation and who is interested in its ongoing existence/development.

My answer to that question is: If there is, it is beyond the capacity of our human minds to comprehend in its fulness, but we can comprehend some small part that is within the limits of our capacity. To assume anything beyond that is purely faith.

Now, my personal experience has been that when I have reached out in 'faith', 'God' has responded in faithfulness. Now, I have had so many supernatural experiences in life that I used to tell people, "I don't just believe in miracles; I depend on them."

I'll share one example as an illustration. This occurred when I was young and was first beginning to seek to understand God. I had a dream which I understood to be telling me to play the number '132' (underground Mafia numbers) for 12 days. Now I had never in my life played the numbers previous to this. So, at the local bar where I had been accustomed to hang out (at this time I no longer drank any alcohol, but would still go to the bar and drink orange juice), I played the number '132' for 11 days for $1/day, during which time it never came up. On the 12th day I played it for $1.50, which was the limit, and I boxed it each way for $1 each (123, 231, etc., etc.). It came up 132, just like the dream had said 12 days previously. Now, what supernatural intelligence knew, and communicated to me, that the last digit on the advanced, declined, and unchanged on the stock exchange (which is what determined the winning number each day) would be 132, 12 days in advance? You can't explain this by arranging 10 pennies or plastic rings in a triangle, or any other physical explanation. This is but one simple example. I have also had far greater and more compelling experiences than this one.

So, does this mean that God created the universe? Obviously, that's quite a leap. But to me this, as well as other experiences, is a clear evidence that there is a prescient, supernatural, intelligent power, greater than myself, in which I can trust, and learn from, and be guided by. And it is not a large leap from that to trust that there is sensient intelligence responsible for creation and which is interested in its ongoing development.


Anonymous Pull The Other One! said...
Mike,

First of all, you're not quite right about the present perfect tense, which actually denotes actions that link past and present. In your case, you probably wanted to stress that those 25 years (a past state) still have a strong influence on you now in the present.

Fair enough, but if you really wanted to make it clear that you no longer consider yourself to be a born-again Christian, you should have used the past simple tense, and left out the word 'have', like so:

I also lived over 25 years as a born-again Christian.

See, it's clear as day now! Sorry to be pedantic, but I'm sure that if you'd left out that one word, people would have been easier on you!

Anyway, now that you've given us some more information, it seems that you're not so far from the views of at least some of us. In fact, I would say that you actually are an ex-christian, or 'post-christian', if you prefer, who happens to still believe in God. So, welcome to the club!

Of course, you're a lot more positive about Christianity than most of us. Some people really have had some awful experiences, so please bear that in mind.

Anyway, it's been an interesting exchange. Stick around, I'm sure you'll find plenty of things worth reading and discussing.


Anonymous Pull The Other One! said...
Mike,

I've just read your last post, which you must have been writing at the same time as mine.

I must say, I didn't think God approved of gambling! Does he do big jackpot lottery numbers as well?


Blogger MikeG said...
Alan, Pull,

Yes, it appears that we were all compiling/posting at the same time.

Oh pedantry! Yuck! :)

"I must say, I didn't think God approved of gambling! Does he do big jackpot lottery numbers as well?"
LOL! I'm still trying to figure that one out.

"Of course, you're a lot more positive about Christianity than most of us. Some people really have had some awful experiences, so please bear that in mind."

I too have had my share of negative experiences, which were all people-related. I prefer to let them fade away into forgotteness, as is fitting. And I won't let them detract from the good experiences I've had with folks of faith who were/are of a better quality character. And I'm still awed by the faithfulness of God.


Anonymous alanh said...
Mike

That's an interesting story which raises many questions, I'll focus on one: leaving coincidence aside for the moment, why is your dream evidence of a supreme being and not evidence of some unknown attribute that you yourself possess? I am extremely skeptical that any "supernatural" events exist, but if they do, why is an active being the cause, as opposed to some sort of Jungian synchronicity or undiscovered capability of the human mind?


Blogger MikeG said...
"I am extremely skeptical that any "supernatural" events exist, but if they do, why is an active being the cause, as opposed to some sort of Jungian synchronicity or undiscovered capability of the human mind?"
========================
Alan, that question is always there, latent, but beyond my ability to formulate any sort of cogent answer to. IOW, I'm open to the possibility that the human mind has the potential to achieve more than we commonly give it credit for. And I think that that potential perhaps is increased when there is a unity of like minds working together. I think that is at least part of the reason why the Christian faith is so influential—because of how believers are united in a common faith in Christ.

As far as the supernatural, in my view it is not natural to know 12 days ahead of time what the number will be as in the above account. If I could do it naturally, I would do it every day. I actually tried to dream another number just after I had that experience. I came up with 232. I did not 'box' it this time since the first number had hit exact. The number came up 322. If I had boxed it, it would have hit. I never played the numbers any more after that. But the experience helped to convince me that there was enough reality to this 'God stuff' to make it worth looking into with some seriousness. I suppose I've never quit looking, and never will. When your experience starts getting into interaction with the elements: wind, thunder, lightning, rainbows, it gets pretty awesome.

As far as an active being being the cause, I don't think it is a good idea to presume that I have those powers resident within me, but rather that I am interacting with spiritual intelligence that is exterior to myself (though in some sense intertwined), with perhaps a hierarchy of beings (in Christian parlance, angelic and/or demonic beings). This could possibly be merely the collective spirit(s) of humanity, but at least includes them. And if there is assumed to be such a hierarchy, it is not unreasonable that there might be a primary progenitor who is the original source and above all.

But, as I said, that is all beyond the ability of our human minds to comprehend in its fulness (at least beyond mine).


Anonymous anyone else said...
webmaster: i base it on the worldwide belief that God has spoke to all peoples at all times. i also believe the guiding principle of life is love not violence.


Blogger .:webmaster:. said...
Worldwide belief? Really? Everyone, in all times, throughout all history, is absolutely convinced that your god speaks to all people in all times?

That's a silly statement. It simply is not true. It is assuredly nothing to base a life upon.

As to you other statement, you are telling me you have based the decisions for your life on a belief you have. But you haven't explained why you have that belief. What you aren't doing is examining WHY you believe what you believe.

That was my point with the questions. Simply having a belief is not evidence that the belief is worth having.


Anonymous alanh said...
MikeG wrote:

I don't think it is a good idea to presume that I have those powers resident within me, but rather that I am interacting with spiritual intelligence that is exterior to myself

Assuming for the moment that the events you describe are real, I would say its a much better idea to presume that either you have those powers resident within you or they are natural occurrences, coincidental or not, rather than presume that some external being is acting through you. According to Occam's razor:

"when multiple competing theories are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selecting the theory that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest hypothetical entities."

In other words, the "god did it" hypothesis is the least likely. We have a high degree of certainty that you exist, we don't have ANY certainty that a spiritual intelligence exists. We can verify the existence and properties of the world around us in various ways, but the only potential evidence of a divine being is ancient human-written texts and various alleged anomalous events, events that always seem to be reported by highly biased individuals.


Blogger MikeG said...
Alanh wrote:

"when multiple competing theories are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selecting the theory that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest hypothetical entities."

In other words, the "god did it" hypothesis is the least likely. We have a high degree of certainty that you exist, we don't have ANY certainty that a spiritual intelligence exists.
=================================
Alan, but that can lead to all sorts of errant conclusions, such as that corn and old undergarments spontaneously generate mice.

“If a dirty undergarment is squeezed…a ferment drained from the garments and transformed by the smell of grain, encrusts the wheat itself with its own skin and turns it into mice…And, what is more remarkable, the mice from corn and undergarments are neither weanlings or sucklings nor premature but they jump out fully formed.”[1]

—Jean Baptiste van Helmont


You know that you have corn, and you know that you have old undergarments, and suddenly mice appear. Therefore, rather than introducing any assumption that any other influences might be at work, it is necessary to accept that the corn and the undergarments spontaneously produced the mice.

Of course that is nonsense. In the same sense, it is nonsense to assume that there must be no incorporeal spiritual intelligence simply because we cannot perceive it with our senses, or because such a thought is foriegn to our understanding.

It's in pushing the envelope and exploring ALL the possibilities (including that God exists) that we can achieve new horizons.


Blogger .:webmaster:. said...
"Of course that is nonsense"

Of course it is. What really is happening is that the magical, invisible faeries that hover precariously around human asses are able to influence the transmogrification of corn into mice.

Duh.

When ridiculous fantasizing is involved, anything can be accepted as an answer that seems to make sense.

To hypothesize that there is a super-duper entity out there is one thing. To go beyond wild hypothesis into the realm of reality, evidence must be presented. In the absence of any evidence, there is not much point in rattling on about made up beings.

Once you establish, through evidence, that such a creature as your god exists, then we would want to explore this god's methods, power sources, genesis, as well as how, where, why, when, and on and on and on. Xrays are invisible. Gravity is invisible. Stars are untouchable. Still, we can study all these things with machines, methods, and mathematics that extend our senses into these areas and beyond. What do suggest we use to study your imagined deity?