Leave no man behind - Letters to the Webmaster

Put yourself
on the map

browse the latest article updates

Who's Online?

Previous Letters:

Letters Archives:

02/02 03/02 04/02 05/02 06/02 07/02 08/02 09/02 10/02 11/02 12/02 01/03 02/03 03/03 04/03 05/03 06/03 07/03 08/03 09/03 10/03 11/03 12/03 01/04 02/04 03/04 04/04 05/04 06/04 07/04 08/04 09/04 10/04 11/04 12/04 01/05 02/05 03/05 04/05 05/05 06/05 07/05 08/05 09/05 10/05 11/05 12/05 01/06 02/06 03/06 04/06 05/06 06/06 07/06 08/06 09/06 10/06 11/06 12/06 01/07 02/07 03/07

Introductory Stuff

WebMaster's Anti-Testimony
Not ready to be nice
Take the Gospel Story Quiz - English
Take the Gospel Story Quiz - French
To the passing Christian
More Reminiscing
Becoming an Ex-Christian
A Letter to CHRISTIANS
A Plea to TRUE Christians
THINK
Test Your Bible Knowledge
Compact Bible Errors Helper
Public Service Pamphlet
Anti-Tracts Archive
Recommended Books
Submit your own testimonial
Letters to the WebMaster
ExChristian.Net Forums
Links Articles and More!
Message the Webmaster
"Voicemail the Webmaster"
World Religions Chart

Leave no man behind
.: posted Friday, April 23, 2004 ::: by .:webmaster:. ::: EmailThis! »

I have been reading through your website off and on during the last few months now - it's a fascinating place. I have a question you may wish to put to your forum. It is one specifically for those who seriously question the very foundation of Christianity. Before I ask, a brief synopsis;

Philosophers from Kant to Wittgenstein, Descartes to Russell, have all added their perspectives of religion, some damning others less so. There is a distinctive line in modern philosophy of religion between those who outwardly denounce the plausibility of Christianity or deities at all, and those who occupy themselves with defining the thought processes that lead to this type of conclusion rather than actually concluding.

Although not a philosopher, Thomas Paine's literary brilliance culminated in The Age of Reason - a truly masterful piece of writing and argumentation - in which he repeatedly states his respect for those whose opinion may differ from his (a not too surprising fact coming from the man who gave us the basis for the UN Declaration of Human Rights). But not unlike Bertrand Russell I feel, Paine also frequently flirts with the idea that we ought to fight the farce that is Christianity. In some instances he is quite belligerent (passionate?) in his rebuke of those choosing to emurse themselves in this "wretched scam".

Herein lies the dilemma: as people who believe that Christianity is at the very most a temporal contortion of pagan tradition and political happenstance, responsible for some of the worst atrcocities in man's histoy, is there not a concomitant moral/ humanist obligation to "de-convert" Christians we come into contact with?

Your site is designed to encourage and help exChristians to move on and build their lives without the religious crutch. But what about those left behind? Does the Humanist movement need to adopt a policy of engagement? And if so, what would be the nature of its approach and from where would it derive its ultimate legitimacy? I find these the most pressing and frustrating questions.

I thought I would throw it out there and see what thoughts come back.

Thanks

Wayne

Add this page to: