Testimonials | Letters | News | Rants | Forums | Submit A Testimonial | Front Page
Archives | Podcasts | Videos | Recent Comments | Live Chat | Printer Friendly Version




Licona vs. Carrier: On the Resurrection of Jesus Christ

.: posted 5/11/2008 ::: by webmdave :::    AddThis Social Bookmark Button









This debate, which examined the rational evidence for faith in Jesus' resurrection, was given at the University of California, Los Angeles on April 19, 2004, and was moderated by S. Scott Bartchy, Professor of History at UCLA and Director of the Center for the Study of Religion.

Richard Carrier
is a historian and philosopher, whose articles have appeared in many publications, including the Skeptical Inquirer and the Secular Web. His book, Sense and Goodness without God: A Defense of Metaphysical Naturalism, is due out next year, along with an anthology, Jesus Is Dead, which includes three chapters by Carrier on the Resurrection. He is currently writing a dissertation on ancient Roman science at Columbia University. He has been involved in online, atheist-theist debates for more than ten years and served as Feedback Editor and Editor in Chief of the Secular Web for many years.

Mike Licona is a New Testament historian with a Master of Arts degree in Religious Studies from Liberty University and is a Ph.D. candidate in New Testament Studies at the University of Pretoria. He is a member of the Society of Biblical Literature and Evangelical Philosophical Society. Mike is the author of three books, the most recent being The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus. Professor Gary Habermas remarks, "In my opinion, Mike's knowledge of the case for Jesus' resurrection places him among an elite number of evangelicals who are writing on the subject today."

Support Richard Carrier's efforts by purchasing a copy of this debate here: http://www.createspace.com/231347


Add this page to: Post to StumbleUpon Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Furl Post to Google Post to Magnolia Post to Netscape Post to Reddit Post to Simpy Post to Slashdot Post to Technorati Post to YahooMyWeb




8 Comments:

Blogger Idea wrote:

I dont think that matters at all, if tomb was empty or not, it doesnt prove or disprove anything supernatural about Jesus figure.

Body could be stolen or they just made it up, but I just cannot see the point why is empty tomb so important. It does not prove that any miracle was involved. :)

posted: May 11, 2008 EST  

Blogger freedy wrote:

I think the babble goes on to say he appeared to multitudes of people after he resurrected.

This too as you said,"was just made up."

posted: May 12, 2008 EST  

OpenID shedevil wrote:

When we read the gospels, we know where jesus was every step of the way. The stories vary, of course, but we read that he was born in Bethlehem; his family ran to Egypt; he was in the temple at age 12; he was baptized in the Jordan; he turned water into wine at Cana, and so on. With every chapter, we can point on the map where he was.

All except for his burial. Then the best we read is that he was buried in "a tomb" in "a cemetary" somewhere in Jerusalem. Do you take this seriously? If the resurrection had taken place, the gospel writers would have recorded exactly where the cemetary was and exactly where the tomb was. But they didn't, because the story is bullshit. The tomb would have been venerated to this day.

All you empty tomb nuts, come forth. Where is the tomb? No tomb, no jesus, and no religion, or relationship, or whatever the hell you call it.

posted: May 12, 2008 EST  

OpenID shedevil wrote:

This is just so funny. Are we to believe that he performed this cute miracle and turned water into Muscatel, and we know the name of the town, but the central fact of christianity, the resurrection, is unrecorded?

posted: May 12, 2008 EST  

Blogger boomSLANG wrote:

Where is the tomb? No tomb, no jesus, and no religion, or relationship, or whatever the hell you call it.

...and let's add to that list, no promise of a perpetually blissful post-mortem existence in the clouds....i.e.."Heaven". This is significant, of course, because if it were not this promise; if it were not for this "carrot", there would be no reason to believe such outlandish, nonsensical rubbish, on such pathetically weak "evidence".

posted: May 12, 2008 EST  

OpenID shedevil wrote:

And Boom, the other thing is the fear of hell. Once that notion gets into your head, you are ready to believe anything. I know. Ive been there.

posted: May 12, 2008 EST  

Blogger eel_shepherd wrote:

shedevil wrote:
"And Boom, the other thing is the fear of hell. Once that notion gets into your head, you are ready to believe anything..."

Exactly. Xtians aren't about heaven; they're about hell. Most of us, when we're thinking about how good it can get, can't really come up with something a whole lot different than being nineteen years old again and being rich and sucking back margaritas in a villa somewhere in the Mediterranean. Which would be nice, granted; but not a whole lot nicer than some of the good times that happen every year anyway in our own lives.

Hell, on the other hand... that's a whole other thing altogether. You can really knock yourself out thinking how bad it could be. An eternity of all your least favourite things, being waterboarded while chewing on tinfoil and needing to pee, while being lectured by your mother in law, with some little pomeranian terrier yapping away in the background. Shouldn't think about this sort of stuff this close to bedtime, might give me bad dreams.

posted: May 13, 2008 EST  

Blogger boomSLANG wrote:

Exactly. Xtians aren't about heaven; they're about hell.

Yup; understood and agreed. My intitial point, however, was that from a christian perspective, the alternative to "Heaven" or "Hell" is the complete annihilation of the "self". In other words, we simple die; the end.

This, of course, is something they cannot fathom, and thus, this is what motivates them to believe the rest of the outlandish rubbish in the pages in the "Holy Bible"..i.e..up-right walking cadavers, talking vegetation, whale-stomach bungaloos, the world's biggest floating zoo, etc.

posted: May 13, 2008 EST  

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The first 200 comments appear here under the article. If over 200 comments are posted, click on the "newer" and "newest" links on Post a Comment page to continue reading the latest comments.

Post a Comment | Create a Link | Post in the Forums | Permalink


  Subscribe to this post's Comments (Atom).
Subscribe to every post's Comments (RSS).
Quickly catch up on all recent comments posted on ExChristian.Net on the Recent Comments page. Or, keep track of comments on individual topics by using .



Site Purpose and Legal Disclaimer

Email Login


Search
ExChristian.Net




Help support this site
with a one-time donation of:
$  

or a recurring monthly donation of:
(type in an amount)

$  

check out:
THE ARCHIVES


Buy Books





Speak Your Mind

ExChristian.Net Forums

Post your own "leaving religion" testimonial

Contact Webmaster:
Email message

Click the button and type in your name and phone number. The system will call your phone and connect you to webmaster's phone for free.
Support This Site

Recent Activity in the Forums:

blogged by blogger

Religion blogs
Top Religion Blogs
Societies, Politics & Relgion

Atheist Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory
BRDTracker
Religion blogs

   


tracker

DEITY OF THE DAY
Featured today:
>> View article

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivs 2.5 License.