.: posted 4/15/2008 ::: by webmdave :::   

 ou812 wrote:

Great point! I must remember this one when asked why I don't believe. Netwriter is very calm and to the point. Thanks for this video!

posted: April 16, 2008 EST  

 Aspentroll wrote:

Since god is imaginary and the
bible, koran, all religions,
are also fictional, his question at the last of the video does not need an answer.
(but that's just my thoughts).

It's a great video and very well done, keep 'em coming.

posted: April 16, 2008 EST  

 billybee wrote:

That was really well done. I know these videos don't materialize out of thin air (so to speak). Thanks for doing the work and caring enough to contribute to the ever growing voice of reason. It DOES make a difference.

I sent in a short letter to my local newspaper. After it ran I had people call and thank me. There are so many unbelievers that are in the shadows. These videos and web sites are the conduit for them to take a stand in our communities.

Jesus' days are numbered....

posted: April 16, 2008 EST  

 Jamie wrote:

Thanks for creating and posting this video. It articulates what I have been trying to say for a long time(with way more actual scholarship to back it up too!).

posted: April 20, 2008 EST  

 mike56 wrote:

Only a wicked generation would seek a sign. You are admiting that after 40 years of being a so called Christian that you still need a sign. It shows me and the rest of the world that you never had faith to begin with. You knew the word for forty years but the word was never inside of you. Jesus will tell you on that special day I never knew you because you did not have an intimate relationship with me.

Mike

posted: May 08, 2008 EST  

 .:webmaster:. wrote:

Mike,

Sticking a gnarled finger of judgmental condemnation in the face of anyone who disagrees with you is really an ineffective evangelistic technique. You really should consider shedding your filthy robes of Pharasism. Those rags make you appear fat, ugly and stupid.

posted: May 08, 2008 EST  

 AtheistToothFairy wrote:

mike56 wrote:
Only a wicked generation would seek a sign

Well Mike56, then I suppose all generations of humans have been wicked, including even Christ's disciples?
How dare them desire any signs from god.

Oddly enough, your god gave these 'wicked' characters throughout the bible, plenty of so called 'signs' (miracles), yet we get ZIP in our present generation. Strange huh.

>You are admiting that after 40 years of being a so called Christian that you still need a sign. It shows me and the rest of the world that you never had faith to begin with.

Yes, I most certainly require a "sign" from-above', and so should you.

No, you're incorrect, in that I very much once-upon-a-time TRUSTED my elders when they told me your god existed, hence, I once was just as sure as you are, that he existed; alas, for all the wrong and ignorant reasons to believe so.

>Jesus will tell you on that special day I never knew you because you did not have an intimate relationship with me.

So you're saying that I failed because I didn't manage to make-love to your jesus?

I'm no expert in the field mike, but I pretty sure you have some serious mental issues going on here and need help right away.
What day is it that you had this intimate relationship with this jesus...Valentines Day?
Just curious is all.


ATF (Who wonders if he'll have to buy jesus some chocolate and roses, before he'll get intimate?)

posted: May 09, 2008 EST  

 mike56 wrote:

webmaster:. i AM NOT TRYING TO BE AN EVANGELISTIC PHARISEE I AM KEEPING IT REAL IF YOU TAKE OFFENSE TO WHAT I SAY PUT A HELMET ON. GO TO ANOTHER SIGHT WHERE BABIES CRY ABOUT HOW THEY ONCE BELIEVED AND NOW BECAUSE THEY NEVER GOT A SIGN DO NOT BELIEVE. WEBMASTER IT IS CALLED WARFARE GET A HINT AND LEAVE. SO WHAT ARE YOU BEING A BLESSING? YOU BELIEF IS SO REAL THAT YOU ARE SHARING ITS LOVE. YOUR BEING A LITTLE HIPOCRITICAL YOURSELF.

posted: May 09, 2008 EST  

 webmdave wrote:

Mike,

You wear the cloak of self-righteousness. If you want to be religious, then be religious. But when you start crying about people submitting to your Aah-thor-a-tee, then you're just being a fat-ass pharisee.

Your flavor of Christianity is repulsive.

posted: May 10, 2008 EST  

 mike56 wrote:

AtheistToothFairy YOU SHOULDN'T NEED A SIGN TO SUSTAIN YOU ANYMORE THAN YOU SHOULD NEED A SIGN TO BE WHAT YOU ARE NOW. YOU BELIEVE IN GOD BECAUSE OF A REAL EXPERIENCE WITH GOD IF YOU REALLY UNDERSTOOD GOD'S WORD THE WAY YOU SAY YOU DID THEN AN INTIMATE RELATIONSHIP IS NOT SEX NOR A VALENTINE EXPERIENCE. THAT IS FOOLISH. IT IS WHEN YOU SPEND TIME TALKING TO GOD AND LISTENING TO HIS VOICE IN RETURN, IT ALSO INCLUDES READING THE WORD AND LIVING EVERY DAY. SORRY IF I SOUND MEAN OR JUDGEMENTAL BUT YOU DO NOT NEED ANYONE TO FEEL SORRY FOR YOU YOU NEED GOD TO SHOW YOU WHO HE IS FOR YOURSELF AND THAT IS NOT SEEKING A SIGN THAT REQUIRES YOU TO SEEK HIM. IF YOUR READING THIS AND YOU GET OFFENDED AT WHAT I SAY THEN MAYBE YOU SHOULD REALIZE THAT THIS IS A BATTLE FOR YOUR SPIRITUAL SOUL AND I DID NOT COME HERE TO BE NICE BUT TO TELL THE TRUTH YOU DON'T LIKE IT MOVE ON.

posted: May 10, 2008 EST  

 webmdave wrote:

Jesus fucking Christ, Mike! Learn to use the shift key. Typing in all CAPS makes you read like a complete moron.

Oh wait...

Never mind.

posted: May 10, 2008 EST  

 webmdave wrote:

And why in the hell do all these brave Christian posters insist on having fundy-nonymous profiles?

posted: May 10, 2008 EST  

 mike56 wrote:

webmdave
Call it what you want you really seem like the religious expert yourself.

posted: May 10, 2008 EST  

 webmdave wrote:

Mike, you're an idiot.

Go away.

Seriously.

Get lost.

posted: May 10, 2008 EST  

 mike56 wrote:

webmdave
Your language is awful and you call me a bad person. Who CARES HOW I TYPE DON'T READ IT IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT.

posted: May 10, 2008 EST  

 webmdave wrote:

On second thought. Keep posting. You're lack of thinking skills is a terrific apologetic against fundy-lunacy.

posted: May 10, 2008 EST  

 webmdave wrote:

I got a better idea, Mike. I'll delete any of your posts that I don't like.

Moron.

posted: May 10, 2008 EST  

 mike56 wrote:

webmdave

I AM NOT GOING AWAY YOUR SO KIND I THINK I'LL KEEP IT UP.

posted: May 10, 2008 EST  

 mike56 wrote:

Resist Satan and he will FLEE.

MIke

posted: May 10, 2008 EST  

 Astreja wrote:

Webmdave: "And why in the hell do all these brave Christian posters insist on having fundy-nonymous profiles?"

Often wondered about that Myself. I frequently click on someone's name to see who they are and what they're all about, but more often than not I just see a name and no profile at all.

C'mon, folks... Get a life! (Or at least make one up so there's something there for us to read.)

posted: May 10, 2008 EST  

 mike56 wrote:

go play with your killer rabbits or have an equoinox party.

Mike

posted: May 10, 2008 EST  

 AtheistToothFairy wrote:

mike56 wrote:
MAYBE YOU SHOULD REALIZE THAT THIS IS A BATTLE FOR YOUR SPIRITUAL SOUL

I find it very odd that some 'thing' is battling for my "spiritual soul", mainly because there is no evidence (anywhere) that shows humans have these souls you speak of.
Oh, but perhaps you'll be the very first human to provide credible evidence that we do, yes?

Good luck in that age-old futile quest, and I'll be sure to watch the science journals for your great discovery of such.


ATF (Who thinks some folks just can't let go of their comforting god-TOYS)

posted: May 10, 2008 EST  

 Astreja wrote:

It's worse than that, ATF. Not only is there no evidence for this "soul" thingamajig that's allegedly under siege, but the two parties slugging it out are likewise unproven.

Kind of hard to watch an invisible fight for, well, nothing.

posted: May 10, 2008 EST  

 AtheistToothFairy wrote:

Astreja wrote:
It's worse than that, ATF. Not only is there no evidence for this "soul" thingamajig that's allegedly under siege, but the two parties slugging it out are likewise unproven.

Astreja,
So let me see if I understand you correctly here, k.

What you're saying is that we have an INVISIBLE god, fighting an INVISIBLE devil, over INVISIBLE human souls, both backed by armies of INVISIBLE angels/demons, using INVISIBLE 'weapons of choice', to do battle with, yes?

Then, depending on who wins a battle for a particular human soul, determines whether that INVISIBLE soul then goes to an INVISIBLE heaven or INVISIBLE hell, right?

In the case of hell, one gets fried for all eternity by an INVISIBLE fire.
In the case of heaven, one gets to have an INVISIBLE fluffy cloud and harp.

In both cases, these INVISIBLE creatures and their INVISIBLE minions, whisper secret messages into our ears from their INVISIBLE vocal chords.


ATF (Who had planned on dressing up as the devil during this year's Halloween, but can't seem to find the required INVISIBLE devil costume and pitchfork in any store)

posted: May 10, 2008 EST  

Post a Comment | Create a Link | Post in the Forums | Permalink

  Subscribe to this post's Comments (Atom).
Subscribe to every post's Comments (RSS).
Quickly catch up on all recent comments posted on ExChristian.Net on the Recent Comments page. Or, keep track of comments on individual topics by using .