For ease of viewing, the 15 videos are grouped in threes. In other words, each of these players contains tree videos.
This is part of a superb series of videos exposing the funny stupidity of creationists and why they deserve to be laughed at. In each case the creationist statements are shown to be outrageously stupid by even the most rudimentary knowledge of science. -- Thunderf00t
Episodes I–III
Episodes IV–VI
Episodes VII–IX
Episodes X–XII
Episodes XIII–XV
Subscribe to the latest Comments (RSS).Quickly catch up on all recent comments posted on ExChristian.Net on the Recent Comments page.
<< Home
Sign up to be notified when new articles and testimonials are posted!
Leaving Christianity
Atheism
Parenting w/o religion
Skepticism
Science vs. Religion
Evolution
Bible
Ethics & Logic
Authors:
Isaac Asimov
Dan Barker
Clarence Darrow
Richard Dawkins
Daniel C. Dennett
Stephen Jay Gould
Sam Harris
Christopher Hitchens
Robert Ingersoll
Robert M. Price
Carl Sagan
Michael Shermer
Julia Sweeney
Misc:
Various works
Audio Books
Apparel
DVDs
Magazines
Software & Games
ExChristian.net is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://exchristian.net/message.php.
before commenting
I don't have enough faith to be a Christian
Conversion, Spiritual Epiphanies and Mystical Experiences
Not ready to be nice
Test Your Bible Knowledge
Take the Gospel Story Quiz - English
Take the Gospel Story Quiz - French
Compact Bible Errors Helper
Anti-Tracts Archive
Becoming an Ex-Christian
A Letter to CHRISTIANS
A Plea to TRUE Christians
Click here to read more latest comments and even subscribe to receive updates of recent comments posted to ExChristian.Net.
|
|
Join the ExChristian.Net Google Group notification list to receive an email whenever a new article is posted. |
| Visit this group |
Ex-Christian.Net Forums
Encouraging ex-ChristiansAs with the Blog, the Ex-Christian.Net forum exists for the express purpose of encouraging those who have decided to leave religion behind. The forum is not an open challenge for Christians to defend what they perceive as an offense against their beliefs. Membership is free and open to all.
ExChristian.Net Facebook page
Encouraging ex-ChristiansThe ExChristian.Net Facebook group is for those who have discovered that Christianity is false. Key words: Atheism, Agnosticism, Deism, Skeptic, Rational, Freethought, Reason, Doubt.
ExChristian.Net Social Network
Encouraging ex-ChristiansThis is a social network extension to the ExChristian.Net websites. Membership is free and open to all who are de-converted or in the process of de-converting.
ExChristian.Net MySpace Group
Encouraging ex-ChristiansArticles, testimonies, rants and debates from people who used to be Christian but now are Ex-Christian. This is an extension ExChristian.Net, and is intended for encouraging ex-Christians.
ExChristian.Net on Twitter
Connecting ex-ChristiansTwitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What are you doing? Join today to start receiving ExChristian.Net's updates.
You also state that H2O is the second most common element in the universe. I believe you've just proved his thesis, that it is uncanny that so much of it is here. You've found it on other planets, but why is so much here compared to the other planets.
Percentages are based on a standard of measurement. Neither one of you stated your standard. It sounds like you're equally equipped to do battle.
I'm not saying that he's the smartest thing on the planet, but you certainly aren't either.
There are 15 videos in this presentation. Did you only watch the first one?
Brother.
I once posted something about his ridiculous evidence that giants once lived on earth. Giants, of course, were mentioned in the Bible, and he was using them to show the Bible was true. I found that some of the skeletons were photoshopped, the result of skull-binding, or were apparent hoaxes (several of them disappeared mysteriously before they could be examined by scientists).
http://tinyfrog.wordpress.com/2007/06/28/youtube-creationism/
This is the "evidence" that creationists bring to the table?
This is the "evidence" that creationists bring to the table?
...like this "evidence"?
Survival of the fakest
http://tinyfrog.wordpress.com/2008/01/19/the-non-believers-review-of-%e2%80%9cthe-case-for-faith%e2%80%9d-objection-3-part-2/
Second, Well's presentation has been debunked in other places on the internet:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/wells/
The whole pdf is just slick propaganda. For example, it completely ignores all the fossils leading from primates to humans and concentrates on one hoax to somehow trick the reader into believing they're all hoaxes.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/species.html
Conveniently, your pdf also ignores all the genetic evidence for human descent.
Here's some information on evolution.
http://tinyfrog.wordpress.com/creationismevolution/
But, it conveniently ignores the fact that Behe argues for common descent of humans and apes - based on evidence. Well's cites Behe as an expert - the very same man who would trash Well's entire "From Apes to Humans" section. If human common descent was as flimsy as Well's says it is, don't you think Behe would agree with Wells? The fact is that Well's article ISN'T presenting the real evidence for human descent from apes. Instead, he's playing propaganda games.
The big bang is a theory in which everything in existence just exploded out of nothingness, if that doesn't sound like God then I don't know what does.
Science deals with reality; religion deals with superstition, the supernatural, and mythology.
You are correct in saying that evolution explains how species change over time because it's Abiogenesis which covers how it started in the first place.
As for the Big Bang is concerned, nowhere does it say that existence came from nothingness. The theory is that all matter was compressed and exploded outwards. What existed prior to that is currently unexplained.
Why do you assume that because you can't explain something, somehow it must have been done by a supreme being? Did you even watch the videos? Are you truly incapable of thinking outside the god-box?
Wow [with the theme music from the twilight zone playing in my mind...]
Cheers, Derrick.
So now noahs flood lasted a "couple of years?"
Foolishness on top of foolishness...
Questions about posting comments? Click Here.