| Put yourself on the map browse the latest article updates Who's Online? Previous Rants:
03.02 04.02 05.02 06.02 07.02 08.02 09.02 10.02 11.02 12.02 01.03 02.03 03.03 04.03 05.03 06.03 07.03 08.03 09.03 10.03 11.03 12.03 01.04 02.04 03.04 04.04 05.04 06.04 07.04 08.04 09.04 10.04 11.04 12.04 01.05 02.05 03.05 04.05 05.05 06.05 07.05 08.05 09.05 10.05 11.05 12.05 01.06 02.06 03.06 04.06 05.06 06.06 07.06 08.06 09.06 10.06 11.06 12.06 01.07 02.07 03.07 04.07 Introductory Stuff WebMaster's Anti-Testimony Not ready to be nice Take the Gospel Story Quiz - English Take the Gospel Story Quiz - French To the passing Christian More Reminiscing Becoming an Ex-Christian A Letter to CHRISTIANS A Plea to TRUE Christians THINK Test Your Bible Knowledge Compact Bible Errors Helper Public Service Pamphlet Anti-Tracts Archive Recommended Books Submit your own testimonial Letters to the WebMaster ExChristian.Net Forums Links Articles and More! Message the Webmaster "Voicemail the Webmaster" World Religions Chart |
![]() Testimonials | Letters | News | Rants | Forums | Submit A Testimonial | Front Page Archives | Podcasts | Recent Comments | Live Chat | Printer Friendly Version On Bush's creation idea .: posted Saturday, August 20, 2005 ::: by .:webmaster:. ::: EmailThis! » I called Larry and he agreed to let me post his letters here. This first letter was published in the August 13 issue of the Star Beacon in response to a "pro-ID" article that appeared earlier in the week. Since this newspaper does not archive its stories or opinion pieces on its website, I cannot provide a corroborating link. -- WM Sir: Kathleen Parker’s “Conservative View” column of Monday, August 8, addressed President George W. Bush’s comments about allowing “intelligent design” (ID) to be discussed in schools. She correctly observes that Pres. Bush did not specifically endorse ID, rather, he emphasized the free discussion of opposing ideas. Nevertheless, it should be no secret that Pres. Bush pledges his allegiance to the preachers of ID. Yet Parker states, “What would be the harm in inviting discussion of this new theory alongside others that have the imprimatur of modern science?” She does have a point. My son in Chicago recently sent me the answer to Parker’s question. It goes like this. Bush told a group of reporters that he feels intelligent design should be discussed in schools. So do I. What the President didn’t say was how it should be discussed, and so, in the spirit of public service, I offer my own intelligent design curriculum, which should be inserted about midway in the two weeks sixth-graders spend learning about evolution and Darwinism. The teacher should sit on his desk, sigh mightily, and say: I quite agree with my son. However, I would go so far as to say ID might be taught in, say, a history class as an example of an historical phenomenon. It might be taught in a sociology class as an example of the debate between competing ideas. It might be taught in a current events class as, goodness knows, it is current. But, most appropriately, it might be taught in a literature class as an example of the power of mythology or fantasy to cloud the critical thinking of otherwise rational people. One thing above all else is certain, intelligent design should never be taught in any science class as it has nothing to do with science. Lawrence E. Gasch Add this page to: Post a Comment | Create a Link | Post in the Forums | Permalink Quickly catch up on comments posted to various articles on http://exchristian.net by clicking here. Keep track of comments on this topic with |
Email Login Help support this site check out: THE ARCHIVES Buy Books ![]() ExChristian.Net Book Store in Cooperation with Amazon Speak Your Mind ExChristian.Net Forums Post your own "leaving religion" testimonial Contact Webmaster: Email message
Art Gallery Christian Nude Art
![]() ![]()
![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivs 2.5 License. |