Testimonials | Letters | News | Rants | Forums | Submit A Testimonial | Front Page
Archives | Podcasts | Recent Comments | Live Chat | Printer Friendly Version



Reassessment of Moral paradigm Long Overdue
.: posted Tuesday, March 15, 2005 ::: by .:webmaster:. ::: EmailThis! »   AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Christians, Jews and Muslims often allege a moral monopoly; but the facts betray another truth. Consider, for example, the history of Jerusalem—a plot of land each tradition claims as holy.

Jerusalem has been fought over 118 times, completely obliterated at least twice, besieged 23 times, attacked an additional 52 times and captured or recaptured 44 times. It has seen 20 revolts, innumerable riots and five distinct periods of violent terrorist attacks during the past century. Jerusalem has changed hands peacefully only twice in 4000 years. Those who killed for Jerusalem believed they alone possessed a God-given right to the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sherif.

Consider the Christian Crusaders’ own accounts of their sacking of Jerusalem in 1099 CE: “The pagans were mercifully beheaded, others plunged from towers, others tortured and burned to death in searing flames. Piles of heads lay in the streets.” These pious Christians burned or disemboweled the infidels alive simply to pilfer their swallowed coins. “After a great and cruel slaughter of Saracens, of whom 10,000 fell…, we stabbed women [and] seized infants by their feet, dashing them against walls, breaking their necks.” All this, for the glory of their God.

Monotheists might protest that religion has produced much worldly virtue as well. But if you believe as I do, that people are essentially good-natured, you might conclude that individuals would act virtuously despite their religion. By contrast, if you believe that people are essentially evil (for example, that even newly-born babies are steeped in Original Sin), you will likely conclude that individuals require outside assistance.

But clearly, religious dogmatism is an inappropriate prescription for morality. How about education instead? Has anyone ever heard of a bloodthirsty horde of historians or scientists who butchered innocent women and children in the name of Thucydides or Aristarchus?

The above is by Kenneth W. Krause. He may be reached at krausekc at msn dot com.


Add this page to: Post to StumbleUpon Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Furl Post to Google Post to Magnolia Post to Netscape Post to Reddit Post to Simpy Post to Slashdot Post to Technorati Post to YahooMyWeb



0 Comments:

Post a Comment | Create a Link | Post in the Forums | Permalink


Quickly catch up on comments posted to various articles on http://exchristian.net by clicking here. Keep track of comments on this topic with .


Site Purpose and Legal Disclaimer

Email Login


Search
ExChristian.Net



Help support this site
with a one-time donation of:
$  
or a recurring monthly donation of:
(type in an amount)

$  

check out:
THE ARCHIVES


Buy Books


ExChristian.Net Book Store in Cooperation with Amazon



Speak Your Mind

ExChristian.Net Forums
Post your own "leaving religion" testimonial

Contact Webmaster:
Email message


Archived Stuff!!
Art Gallery

Christian Nude Art

blogged by blogger






Subscribe with Bloglines

Top Religion Blogs

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivs 2.5 License.