News of interest to former Christians


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
From LiveScience.Com:

You are reading these words right now because 600 million years ago, an aquatic animal called a Hydra developed light-receptive genes—the origin of animal vision.

It wasn't exactly 20-20 vision back then though.

Hydras, a genus of freshwater animals that are kin to corals and jellyfish, measure only a few millimeters in diameter and have been around for hundreds of millions of years.

Scientists at the University of California, Santa Barbara studied the genes associated with vision (called opsins) in these tiny creatures and found opsin proteins all over their bodies.

Though they don't have eyes or any specific light-receptive organs, researchers think that the light-sensing proteins concentrated in the mouth area of the Hydras help them to use light sensitivity to search out prey.

Because studies of animals that evolved earlier, such as sponges, don't show the same light sensitivity, scientists were able to pinpoint the Precambrian date that animal vision first started to evolve.

"We now have a time frame for the evolution of animal light sensitivity," said study leader David Plachetzki, a UC Santa Barbara graduate student. "We know its precursors existed roughly 600 million years ago.

These findings, detailed in a recent issue of the online journal PLoS ONE, counter arguments by anti-evolutionists that evolution can only eliminate traits and cannot produce new features, the authors say.

“Our paper shows that such claims are simply wrong," said co-author Todd Oakley, also a UC Santa Barbara biologist. "We show very clearly that specific mutational changes in a particular duplicated gene (opsin) allowed the new genes to interact with different proteins in new ways. Today, these different interactions underlie the genetic machinery of vision, which is different in various animal groups.”

 
Anonymous Stephen B said...
oxrijarThe world is complex. Some Christians say dumb things, like Earth is 6000 and man are years old, but some have no trouble integrating their intellectual notions with these scientific findings. But to rail against all Christians because some Christians say dumb things is dumb too. It's called Reductio ad absurdum. I'm not a Christian, btw.


Anonymous Brent Seth said...
In the pure light of science, I have no qualm denouncing all Christians. If the first line of the first page of the holy book is wrong, as clearly it is, then nothing that follows should be regarded as anything but the ramblings of lunatics.


Blogger TastyPaper said...
"In the pure light of science, I have no qualm denouncing all Christians. If the first line of the first page of the holy book is wrong, as clearly it is, then nothing that follows should be regarded as anything but the ramblings of lunatics."

Seconded, especially considering the last book.


Post a Comment | Create a Link | Post in the Forums | Permalink



The first 200 comments appear here under the article. If over 200 comments are posted, click on the "newer" and "newest" links on the Post a Comment page to continue reading the latest comments.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

  Subscribe to this post's Comments (Atom).
Subscribe to every post's Comments (RSS).
Quickly catch up on all recent comments posted on ExChristian.Net on the Recent Comments page.

<< Home