You are a young documentary filmmaker with a reputation for capturing politicians' antics. In a deliberate departure from politics, your latest film is a road trip into the world of evangelical Christians that includes a drive-through church, a Christian wrestling federation, a stand-up Christian comic, an evangelical Elvis and a biblical miniature golf course complete with the empty tomb of Jesus.
It just so happens, though, that your designated tour guide in that world is the Rev. Ted Haggard, then president of the National Association of Evangelicals who, after your film is finished, is accused of buying illegal drugs from a male prostitute and paying him for sex. And your mother, it turns out, makes history by becoming the first female speaker of the House just weeks before your film is broadcast.
Those two big events are the back story for Alexandra Pelosi, whose film "Friends of God: A Road Trip With Alexandra Pelosi,'' is to be shown on HBO on Thursday, Jan. 25. The youngest child of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the California Democrat sworn in earlier this month as speaker of the House, Alexandra Pelosi said the other day she worried that her film would not be received in an "open-minded way.''
People might love it or hate because of her mother or because of its association with Haggard, she said. But what she really wanted, Pelosi said, was to further the conversation about religion and culture.
"I believe in the culture war,'' she said. "And you know what? If I have to take a side in the culture war I'll take their side,'' meaning the Christian conservatives. "Because if you give me the choice of Paris Hilton or Jesus, I'll take Jesus.''
Pelosi wrote, directed and produced "Friends of God,'' which took her through 16 states and the District of Columbia with a small, hand-held camera. It is offered as a series of snapshots, she said, with a focus on conservative evangelicals, including the ministers Jerry Falwell and Joel Osteen. In the film, Haggard explains the allure of evangelical
Christianity and extols the primacy of sex among evangelicals.
"I unfortunately chose the wrong leading man,'' Pelosi said of Haggard, whom she picked for his credibility. She liked him, she said, and they spent a great deal of time together.
"Pastor Ted was my tour guide,'' she said. "When I met him he was so reasonable and open, and he took me camping at Pikes Peak. He taught me how to shoot a gun at the top of Pikes Peak. I thought he was the most reasonable man I had met on the road.''
After his fall, Pelosi scurried back to the editing room, saddened.
"We had to take some stuff out,'' she said. "But you can't do an entire movie without the failed guy.''
Pelosi, 36, is best known for her films "Journeys With George'' (about George W. Bush) and "Diary of a Political Tourist'' (about Democratic presidential candidates).
"I would like to think that evangelicals would love this movie,'' she said, adding that she tried hard to make them look their best. "But a lot of them won't even watch it because they don't want to watch my mom's daughter's movie.''
The Rev. Leith
Anderson, who replaced Haggard as president of the National Association of Evangelicals, said he expected that evangelical Christians would decide to watch "Friends of God'' for the same reasons as other viewers: buzz and reviews.
"I hope more and more Americans realize there is a broad diversity of evangelicals, a diversity in race, politics and denominations,'' said
Anderson, the senior pastor of the Wooddale Church in
Eden Prairie, Minn. "If that comes across in the documentary that's really good.''
"Friends of God'' opens with an on-screen declaration that the documentary (which Pelosi began shooting on her honeymoon in June 2005) was completed before Haggard's scandal.
Pelosi said she thought many viewers might want to sneak a peek at Haggard, the founder and former senior pastor of the New Life Church in Colorado Springs, Colo.
"You know, all the surveys say that evangelicals have the best sex life of any other group,'' Haggard says slyly to the camera, to which the effusive Pelosi responds, "No way.'' Haggard then asks a parishioner at his 14,000-member church how often he has sex with his wife. The man says: "Every day. Twice a day.''
Days before the Democrats captured the House and Senate, Haggard was dismissed by his church's board of overseers for "sexually immoral conduct.'' A male prostitute in Denver had said in a radio interview that Haggard had been a monthly customer and buyer of methamphetamines. Haggard responded that not all the accusations were true. But he stated in a letter read in his church that "enough of them are true that I have been appropriately and lovingly removed from ministry.''
Did Pelosi have any inkling that Haggard was not as-advertised?
"I did,'' she said. "People flock to the church for a reason. Some people flock to the church for a reason. It seemed like there was some reason he was so drawn to me. There was something in him. I mean, if he was a true red-state evangelical, we wouldn't have sort of clicked.'' And he never gay-bashed, she said.
But Pelosi said the film's point was that the evangelical Christian movement was big -- bigger than any one pastor.
"Depending on whom you ask, there could be between 50 and 80 million evangelical Christians in America,'' Pelosi says in "Friends.''
On the road, she said, she was repeatedly asked about her own beliefs. "I got saved five times a day,'' she said, describing herself as a believer in God and a lapsed
Roman Catholic who dislikes church. But she and her husband, Michiel Vos, a journalist for Dutch media, intend to make certain that their son, Paul Michael Vos (born Nov. 13), goes to church, she said, so he would have "more than himself and capitalism to believe in.''
As a first-time mother, a fairly new wife and the sister of four siblings, Pelosi clearly has her own take on so-called family values. But at least one Pelosi never sees any of her work in advance but is invited to screenings like everyone else, she said.
"The last thing I need is her editing my film,'' Pelosi said cheerfully, talking about her mother. "She'll be subtle, the same way she comes to my house and says I need to drop one of the baby's feedings. You don't get to be speaker of the House by being subtle.''
"...After his fall, Pelosi scurried back to the editing room, saddened..."
Thus her comfort level with the New Testament as it has come down to us.
BTW, imagine the false-dichotomy of having only jebus and Paris Hilton to choose between; enough to make me rethink my ideas of Hell...
somehow this sort of misperception and type of addled thinking, so prevalent in our society, has to be overcome.
How about neither of the above? There are so many, many, many more humans in the world!
What I can say for certain is that Jesus loves both Paris Hilton and Ted Haggard.
Now as far as Nanci Pelosi who stands against everything pro-life, me thinks that it certainly is not "simple-minded evangelical propaganda," contrary to what chris said.
I can see that at least anonymous 1:55PM seems to be open minded enough to consider that there is a real Jesus.
This ought to evoke comment.
...
You can say that you BELIEVE Jesus loves them. You are NOT free to make the statement that you know it, because you donīt, and it would be a lie.
And is it me, or is Alex Pelosi full of shit? The guy she shot the thing with turns out to be a fake, promptly she edits her flick. COWARD!
People may try to club you with Truth, but each person picks and chooses his or her own path and their own beliefs, I just ask each to explore and make up your own mind for yourself, not because of something a person or Pastor or Professor told you, or Dave.
You do the research yourself about God or no God, Jesus is Lord or Jesus is Man, Islam, Koran, Juddism, and any other religion or non-religion.
And if you decide to follow one follow it with your full heart, and not just a half heart.
I agree completely.
Let me know how actually doing that works out for you, huni.
I have plenty of joy in my life already! Thanks for the offer, but no thanks. I don't need any more religious bologna. I'm glad that the imaginary world of angels, gods and demons makes you happy, though.
Sincerely.
Um, no. Read your Bible again till you get it through your head that the Biblical god is a sadistic prick that gives gods a bad name.
A drowned planet, the genocide of the Amakelites, the torture of Job (on a bet between Yahweh and Satan, no less), the sanctioning of slavery, the sadism of Hell... This is not a being worthy of anyone's worship.
As for Haggard, no christian ever has claimed perfection, thats why we preach forgiveness. I don't know him or his heart, but neither do you.
Patty Nottoli
First I'd like to say that God shows us in the Bible that he loves human beings very much. If He didn't love us, he wouldn't have willingly died for us.
In John 3:16, Jesus says "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life."
I strongly disagree with your interpretations of the Biblical stories that you listed, but no amount of debating can change a person's heart. I challenge you to take the words of the Bible to heart to see how much God loves you.
---Greg
---Greg
"First I'd like to say that God shows us in the Bible that he loves human beings very much. If He didn't love us, he wouldn't have willingly died for us."
This is laughable. Not only do you believe the Bible to be an accurate account of some invisible, intangible and undetectable super-being... You also believe that this same being, who allegedly drowned virtually all life on this planet is capable of love?
I have a much simpler job description for a loving god: No flood, no Original Sin, no hell, no crucifixion, no apocalypse.
And, even if it actually happened (and, honestly, I don't think it did), "dying for us" makes no sense at all. Your purported god is omnipotent, right? So why does it need some elaborate and thoroughly ghastly blood sacrifice in order to forgive less-powerful beings of a crime that it, itself claims we committed? Does. Not. Compute.
"In John 3:16..."
Cut! I fucking despise John 3:16. To paraphrase Arthur Dent, "Ah. This is obviously some strange new definition of 'love' that I wasn't previously aware of."
And, in My opinion, anyone who willingly accepts the supposed sacrifice of Jesus is morally bankrupt. Allowing someone else to take the rap for you is dishonourable.
"I challenge you to take the words of the Bible to heart to see how much God loves you."
Challenge rejected. Your pretend god(s), rejected. Your Bible, rejected. Christianity, rejected. You do realize that this site is called EX-Christian.net, don't you?