In a trial outcome Friday that apparently stunned members of an Athens, Ohio, church congregation, a Hocking County jury convicted the church's pastor of committing public indecency in a state park lavatory on May 15.
"Oh, no," blurted out one audience member in the packed courtroom, as the jury foreman in Hocking County Municipal Court read out the guilty verdict against 57-year-old H. Willard Love, senior minister of the
Athens Church of Christ.
One young woman in the audience burst into tears, and could be seen outside the courtroom later, sobbing inconsolably.
Love was arrested after he allegedly masturbated in front of an undercover park ranger in the restroom at the spillway of Lake Logan State Park, off U.S. Rt. 33. After deliberating more than an hour and a half Friday, a four-man, four-woman jury found him guilty despite Love's having put on a vigorous defense in which he portrayed his arrest as the result of a misunderstanding by the arresting officer.
Judge Richard M. Wallar fined Love $500 and court costs (which will probably be much more than the fine), and sentenced him to serve three days in jail and 14 eight-hour days of community service.
Hocking County assistant prosecutor David Sams didn't ask for a specific sentence, though he did tell Wallar that park rangers have had a longstanding problem with sexual activity at the Lake Logan restroom, and that "they have a legitimate interest in sending a message" that such offenses will be treated seriously.
Defense attorney K. Robert Toy asked Wallar not to give his client jail time, noting that Love has no prior criminal record and is a respected clergyman. "Mr. Love is a great asset to our community," Toy argued. "There is no sense in putting him in jail."
Wallar, however, gave Love 60 days in jail, with 50 days suspended. He gave him the options of serving 10 days behind bars, or doing three days plus community service, of which Love chose the latter.
Sams said later that if Love had pled to the charge against him - a third-degree misdemeanor - he could probably have been given a small fine, as other men arrested the same day for public indecency at the restroom were. By choosing to fight the charge at trial, however, Sams said, Love opened himself up to a harsher penalty if convicted.
"It's rather common that if someone goes through a trial and testifies, and the jury comes back and says they didn't believe the testimony, that (the defendant gets) some jail time," he explained.
Love said he must confer with Toy as to whether he wants to appeal the verdict, but continued to insist he did nothing illegal in the park restroom on the morning of May 15.
"I know I'm innocent, (but) I respect the court," he declared. "And I appreciate all the support that the community has given me. We did our best to go to trial to try to prove our innocence."
IN THE TRIAL, the state relied on the testimony of two rangers from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, and a tape made of a brief exchange in the restroom between Love and one of the rangers, who was in plainclothes and wearing a hidden microphone.
The defense called as witnesses Love, his wife, and his doctor.
The rangers told a story in which Love entered the empty restroom, and when officer Jeremy T. Davis entered behind him in plainclothes, found Love "massaging his penis back and forth very, very rapidly with his right hand." When Davis struck up a conversation with Love, he testified, Love continued to masturbate in front of him, and made statements suggesting he might want to leave with the officer and go to the second man's residence.
Love offered a wholly different explanation for what was heard on the surveillance tape. He readily admitted that when Davis entered the lavatory, he, Love, was massaging his genitals, but said he often has to do this in order to urinate, because of a medical condition he has suffered for many years. (Love's wife confirmed this in her testimony.)
The minister explained the suspicious-sounding comments he made to Davis by saying he became frightened that Davis planned to do him harm. He noted that the undercover officer struck up a conversation while standing behind him, out of plain view and blocking his exit from the restroom, then let about 30 seconds go by without saying anything. After this, he said, Davis made the observation that he didn't see anyone else around, which made Love even more uneasy.
At this point, Love testified, he looked around to locate the officer, initially couldn't find him, and then was shocked to see Davis bent over, peering around a low dividing wall at Love's crotch with a "weird grin" on his face.
"I look around and he is bent over with his hands on his knees and his head is crooked around like this," he demonstrated. "I freaked out... I had never experienced anything in a public restroom like that."
Many of his comments to Davis, according to Love, such as asking him if he were married or if he had "a place" to go to nearby, were designed to keep the other man relaxed, with the aim of Love's getting out of the restroom and to his car. Love noted that he has experience as a counselor in dealing with people in tense situations, and has learned to speak calmly and parrot what the other person says.
"I'm just trying to get him to back off, so I just repeated what he said to me to get him to back off," he claimed. "I know if I can get to my car, I can get away from him... I just want to get away from this guy."
The prosecution, however, hammered on Love's comments to Davis such as "what are you looking for," "too bad you're not in Columbus," and "you got a place?" Love at one point on the tape also tells Davis that he doesn't like to meet people in public restrooms because "I just don't feel safe."
Sams also put heavy emphasis on a questionnaire Love answered for officers after his arrest in which he supposedly answered "yes" to two questions, one about whether he knew he had been engaging in a high-risk activity, and the other about whether he knew that men soliciting sexual activity in public restrooms have been assaulted and murdered.
Love admitted answering yes to both questions. However, he said, he did not hear the portion of the second question referring to sexual soliciting, and heard only the part about men being murdered in public restrooms. Having known someone in Athens this happened to, he said, he answered yes - and only found out afterwards that the question was phrased in such a way as to imply that he himself had been looking for sex in the restroom.
Love also noted that the officers never gave him the questionnaire to review, and that he never signed it to approve his answers.
ANOTHER POINT OF Sams' case was the question of why Love chose a smelly, open-pit lavatory some distance off the highway, rather than going to one of the closer businesses at the U.S. Rt. 33-Ohio Rt. 664 exit, or to a rest stop with flush toilets a little further up the highway.
Love explained that when he takes medication for a chronic sinus infection, which had flared up recently, he has a very difficult time urinating, and sometimes has to go to great lengths massaging his back, thighs or genitals to be able to pass water.
Both Love's wife, Phyllis Love, and his doctor, William Rankin, backed up Love's claim that when he takes medicine for a sinus infection - which he was suffering at the time of his arrest - he has great difficulty urinating.
Phyllis Love said her husband sometimes has to massage himself for a long time at home to urinate. "When he's in that condition, (it can take) at least 10 minutes, or even more," she said. "You would think that someone was trying to masturbate, but it's not that."
She also confirmed that the day of Love's arrest, the minister had a full and tightly scheduled agenda of pastoral visits, including trips to Nelsonville, Lancaster and Chillicothe. He was on his way to Lancaster when he stopped off to use the restroom.
Sams repeatedly questioned Love as to why he didn't choose a more convenient and modern bathroom, and Love repeatedly told him that he wanted someplace quiet and preferably empty of other people, because he knew he might have to make an extended effort to urinate. If the restroom didn't meet his requirements, he told the prosecutor, "it could be on the side of the road two feet behind the guardrail, and it wouldn't do me any good."
In his summation, Sams told the jury that he believes Love was legitimately out on church business on May 15 as the minister claimed, "but I don't doubt that he's looking for a quickie, either."
He acknowledged that nothing on the surveillance tape clearly records Love making a sexual proposal to the officer (which he wasn't charged with), but suggested that if the jury could read between the lines, it would conclude that that's what Love had in mind.
"He didn't cross that line to where he actually solicited sex from the officer, but you can see where they were headed," he said.
link
The fact that the guy's medical condition was corroborated by his wife and his doctor says a lot. Perhaps this guy is just guilty of terrible judgment by not using a friggin' stall or some other more private place to do his business. It's not my place to assume guilt or innocense since I wasn't on the jury, but the guy's defense argument is not really farfetched. I hope the guy is really innocent, for his sake.
To me, it sounds like a terrible miscommunication. Kind of like in the movie "Hoodwinked", only with two people here instead of four.
Besides, the penalty is small. The minister should have an excommunication warning slapped on him or something a bit harsher to that respect on that side of retribution.
There is a big difference between jerking off and trying to coax yourself to piss. Besides they have it on TAPE!
No, to mock the minister (they all deserve that).
Christians lie over and over again that a belief in Gawd is necessary for morality, and that Xtians are morally superior to non-Xtians.
I don't know about this guy, but clergy keep spewing their bullshit about "sexual immorality" from their pulpits-- usually about innocuous things like homosexuality or non-marital sex.
Then the commit something like this.
Eesh.
Onanite
The webmaster posted this story to show that pastors and ministers are no more moral that anyone else. It's the preponderance of these stories that convince us of this. Most of the stories I've read here scream 100% guilty, this one just doesn't to me for some reason. The paralegal student part of my brain doesn't like fact that the plain-clothed officer approached HIM rather than the other way around--it smacks of entrapment.
Let's just all breathe a sigh of relief that the guy's in jail and my opinion isn't going to change that. :)
Michelle Mybell
That being said I have virtually no doubt in my mind that he is actually 'guilty'.
Let me make two points. First, I have a deep and prodound distrust of modern 'law enforcement'. They are generally out to frame people, meet quotas, generate revenue, generate political support, fabricate evidence, lie, extort, torture, and cheat the system in every way they possible can. There are very few good cops.
This sort of 'warden' is almost certainly a closet pervert himself, and no doubt professes string Christian faith.
Second, The 'act' this guy was doing probably shouldn't be a crime at all. It's borderline. I'm not advocating for that sort of behavior, but it really is not such a big deal. It's the same class of 'crime' as using a cell phone in a movie theatre -- it's bad behavior, and it get's you escorted away from the location. But we shouldn't bring this to public court. Remember, this guy has now got to register as a 'sex offender'.
Remember folks that it's the same damned right-wing Christians that put these laws into place in the first place. It's humorous and ironic when these totalitarian laws snare one of their own, but two wrongs don't make a right.
The only reason the cop should have been there is if he's making a security patrol to guard against an actual, real murderer - or he needs to piss.
It's Big Brother bullshit.
I'm thinking that if I were in a smelly park restroom and some stranger struck up a conversation while grinning at my stuff, I'd excuse myself and high-tail it out of there. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't stand around making small talk and wacking my pud -- for any reason.
I notice the doctor doesn't say anything about there being a verifiable condition that would cause someone to need to yank his pole in order to take a leak. If this is a commonly known problem, I'm sure the doctor could have cited a few examples.
I'll give it this: it's definitely a strange story.
Bad park rangers? Maybe. Bad jury members? Possibly. And a bad judge too?
I wonder.
As far as this guy continuing to "stroke" himself while the officer engaged in him in conversation, it very well could be that he chose embarrassment over the possibility of a bladder infection, which can happen if you hold your urine in for too long, or if you do not empty your bladder completely. Bladder infections are extremely painful and uncomfortable and can lead to kidney infections which are life-threatening.
Also, if this restroom is such a disgusting pit and a haven for perverts, board the place up! Apparently there were "other" restrooms further up the road he could have used, why keep this one open?
My apologies for the ongoing doubt, I watch a lot of Law & Order. :)
Although I am inclined to say he's innocent... I don't know.
And how fast does one have to "massage" in this medical case???? Seems a difference in massage and yank. HAHHAHAHA
Let him be found guilty and learn his little lesson. Stay OUT of those damnable sewage pits.
Tim
Rock N Ryan
i will always love to see a paster get his goose cooked, but im not so sure in this case..
Christians are supposed to care about each other. They are family to each other. They are supposed to forgive, even when not asked. They are supposed to "restore" the one who has done wrong and bring him back to where he was--or better. Now, his church and his flock will probably turn their backs on him. That, is the worst thing that is coming out of all of this. If I would ever think about trying out his church--I would not--because of them turning against him.
I agree with the former post about cops though. I too, have a profound mistrust of them and all authority for that matter. Entrapment here is obvious.
To what, christians believe everyone is sinful, and incapable of being sinless... exactly, what state should a real christian "restore", this guy back to?
If this dudes' wife thinks he has to massage his penis to urinate, she is willing to believe anything... oh, that's right, she's the wife of a pole polishing preacher.
I know from experience that when taking certain medications it can be extremely difficult to urinate even though the need is there. For example, a heavy dose of morphine will do this to you the day after taking it. So the argument that his medical condition is fraudulent is without merit, especially since his doctor testified!
Secondly, I don't understand why some people think that the fact that he continued to appease this park ranger proves that he was enjoying himself. He stated that the ranger was blocking the only exit and for all he knew he could have had a weapon. I probably would have done the same thing because it is the safest way to get out of there unharmed.