FORT ATKINSON WI - William J. Smith sparked the curiosity of his neighbors almost from the day he moved to Jefferson County last fall.
It had been years since anyone had tried to start a church in Fort Atkinson, and Smith's effort was particularly unusual.
He installed an altar in his apartment and invited people for daily morning Mass and evening prayers, calling his undertaking "A Vatican-Free Monastic Community."
There would be more surprises for neighbors.
Smith, 55, was convicted in 1989 of two counts of second- degree sexual assault in Door County for having sex with a 15-year-old boy. Smith was pastor of Christ the King Episcopal Church in Sturgeon Bay at the time. The victim was an altar boy with a learning disability.
For the rest of his life, Smith must notify the state of his whereabouts and activities so he can be listed on Wisconsin's sex offender registry (
widocoffenders.org). State officials say Smith failed to do so, and it is this allegation that now finds Smith back in legal trouble and at odds with some of his neighbors.
There are currently 18,319 people on the state's sex offender registry, and charges against them for failing to keep their information updated are not uncommon.
Registry officials have referred charges against more than 1,500 offenders since 1998, said Grace Roberts, registry supervisor.
However, Smith's case is unusual because of the number of items he allegedly failed to notify the registry about and because he is attempting to re- establish himself in the same position of community authority that led to his convictions, Roberts said.
Officials with the state Department of Corrections say Smith moved from Milwaukee to Fort Atkinson without notifying them, used the alias "Father Abbot Joseph" in interactions with others and failed to inform them of his church-related volunteer and work activities. All are violations of the registry law, Roberts said.
The alleged violations led Smith to be charged March 14 in Jefferson County Circuit Court with one count of breaching the state's sex offender registry statute, a felony punishable by up to six years in prison.
"Sex offenders thrive on secrecy," Roberts said. "Making sure they're not anonymous is obviously a useful crime prevention tool."
Smith, who declined to be interviewed, is free on a $500 signature bond. A pretrial conference is set for June 7.
Smith's attorney, Michael Witt, said the allegations against his client are "less than clear" in the criminal complaint and that Smith is currently in compliance with the state's sex registry law.
That law, enacted in 1993, allows the state to track sex offenders and disseminate information about them. Smith - like others who have served their prison time and are no longer under state supervision - is required to provide updated information within 10 days whenever he changes his residence, school enrollment or employment.
The state sends out an annual verification form on the offender's birthday, but registrants also are subject to random verification checks. The latter is what tripped up Smith, according to court records. His address was correct on his birthday last May, but a call by a registry official in December turned up a disconnected phone number in Milwaukee.
The registry official then sought unsuccessfully to find him through various means, including searches of court records, death files and license plate numbers. An anonymous tipster alerted the state on Feb. 13 of Smith's mid-November move to Fort Atkinson.
During the time registry officials were searching for him, Smith was employed by a different state agency - the Department of Workforce Development. Since June 21, 2004, Smith has been an employment and training specialist at the Jefferson County Job Center in Jefferson.
He continues to work at the job center, earning an annual salary of $32,718. Rose Lynch, a department spokeswoman, said Smith is to have no contact with youth in his state job.
Asked why the Department of Corrections wasn't able to locate Smith through his job, Roberts said registry officials call employers only as a last resort because they don't want to jeopardize an offender's job stability, which often is a key to successful reintegration.
Roberts said registry officials were particularly concerned by Smith's church activities.
"Anytime a person who is required to register assumes a position of power or authority in the community, it brings our attention," she said. "In that regard, this case sticks out."
Smith operates the church, which he calls "The Abbey of the Incarnation, The Order of Saint Benedict," out of his home at 115 E. Sherman Ave. near downtown Fort Atkinson. The large house is divided into three apartments, of which Smith rents one.
On his Web site (
www.incarnationabbey.org), Smith describes the abbey as "a welcoming Christian monastic community in which everyone who professes and believes in our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is welcome."
The abbey is part of the Independent Catholic Christian Church, based in Philadelphia. Bishop Tim Cravens did not respond to an e-mail inquiry as to Smith's status within the denomination.
When a Fort Atkinson police investigator asked Smith how he got the title "Father Joseph Abbot," Smith told him he gave it to himself, according to a police report.
John Leonard, an associate professor of religious studies at Edgewood College in Madison, said the denomination is a very small movement that split from the Roman Catholic Church in Holland in the 1870s. The sect acts independently of papal authority and is much more liberal in its views than the Catholic Church, ordaining female and gay priests, for instance.
Debbie Tesch lives in one of the other apartments at 115 E. Sherman Ave. and immediately took to Smith. He seemed very caring, and she liked his Christian ideals, she said.
She talked to him daily and let her twin 7-year-old sons and her 11-year-old daughter attend prayer services on their own at his apartment.
When a Fort Atkinson police detective told her about Smith's past in March, she felt betrayed and confronted Smith about his 1989 conviction.
"He said, 'The kid was almost old enough to consent.' That's what really got me," Tesch said.
Tesch also learned that Smith posted a photo of himself and her three children on his church Web site without her knowledge or consent. She said he initially denied the photo existed, even though a copy of the Web site with the photo on it is now part of the criminal complaint.
Tesch said she no longer has any contact with Smith. While she supports the reintegration of offenders into society, she cannot condone his secrecy. "Part of rehabilitation is honesty, not denial," she said.
Other neighbors echoed the need for offenders to abide by the registry regulations.
"It's a very simple process to follow," said Becky Rice, who lives on the same block. "If he's not in compliance, he's clearly trying to fly under the radar, and I have a problem with that as a neighbor. People have a right to know this kind of information."
Deb Yoder, the third tenant at 115 E. Sherman Ave., said she was initially shocked early this year to learn of Smith's past but has not had any concerns about him since.
"We were all talking in the hallway, and he more or less said, 'If you have a problem with me, let me know.' "
Smith's Web site encourages others to consider joining his monastic community.
Among the application requirements: an autobiography, eight letters of recommendation and a sexual misconduct background check.
link
Last night's program featured several who claimed to be very religious, including a 27 year-old divinity seminary student who came loaded with condoms in hopes of trysting with a 12 year-old girl. There were three other True Christians™ and a Moslem. A previous episode included a rabbi is his 50s who was hoping to have sex with a 13 year-old boy.
Just because someone claims to be religious doesn't mean they can't also be a perv. If cleanliness is next to godliness, then godiness is next to insanity.
I wished I had seen last night's episode. It just goes to show you how repression by a religion screws up a person's sexual urges. They can't have regular sex with another consenting adult outside of marriage because it's "sinful," so that causes them to seek another avenue--with a child.
I saw this one program that had a story about an Amish girl who was raped for years by two of her brothers. She finally had one of them arrested. At his trial, there were all these Amish women crying for him, begging the court to forgive him. The judge scolded the crying women, asking if any of them had cried for the girl who had been raped over and over. It's beyond words how sick it is for someone like that to feel they deserve forgiveness because it's commanded in the bible. Apparently a person can be forgiven for molesting a child, but blaspheming the holy spirit will not be forgiven. What kind of logic is that?
I really appreciate what you said on your post about forgiveness.
One of my issues with the "saints" was that they kept on insisting I contact my abusive mother. "You have to forgive her," they said, shaking their finger at me.
Of course, the idiots didn't know what kind of psycopath she is, but they don't care either. That's what they call "love."
The guiltied me into contacting her several times, and every time I just received more abuse.
They do have a very strange idea of forgiveness that favors the worst people.
Lorena
And another childs life destroyed compliments of a loving God and his chosen teacher.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12503802/
You are not accountable to the child, but only to God, and you can always make yourself believe God has forgiven you.
Ex. A father who had sexually abused his daughter for years, much later during a confrontation with her did not ask her to forgive him, but instead said "God has forgiven me, now you must do the same."
Christians (and people in other religions) will deny this for a variety of reasons, at least one of which, in my opinion, is that it is too much to swallow. To accept that a full third of the world is daily swallowing poisonous lies, and has done for centuries, is unacceptable.
"Menschliches, allzumenschliches" - Human, all too human.
This might also mean that it is not so much that mankind will finally take responsibility for its actions when it sheds religion, but will shed religion when it starts taking responsibility for its own actions.
That would make the end of religion a matter of evolution.
I believe I can call this irony.
They had an on going affair for over a year before it was finally discovered.
The sad part is that he was never convicted, but he is registered as a sex offender.
However, he now has ANOTHER church and many of the members from the previous followed him.
It is sickening how hypocritcal Christians are. When it is time to stand up and do the right thing they won't do a goddamn thing.
Lorena, I also cannot imagine ever forgiving the people who had hurt me. I may not have turned them in or confronted them, but they will never have my trust or love. That is my punishment for them.
Michelle (in case I screw this up again)
of christianity.I hope he's alright
now.
After the first (or second) time, it obviously did not work. Those people should have gotten the bloody hint.
Mike,
How would they not be tolerated? I was under the impression Canada had freedom of religion.
Todd,
What the preacher did was abominable and what his parioshners who continue loyalty to him is foolish at best. Bad, bad, bad.
Anonymous,
What if the persons who hurt you were sorry for what they'd done and were sincere about it? People picked on me when I was in elementary school--if I kept on hating them (especially since they've all grown up and become nice people now), it would not be good for anybody.
Freedy,
That's really screwed up, man.
you said " Lorena,
After the first (or second) time, it obviously did not work. Those people should have gotten the bloody hint."
Yes, they should have, but in my experience Christians are clueless. You seem to be under the impression that those people were the same people. That isn't the case. I am talking about christians from all kinds of churches over a period of 18 years, so my comment isn't made lightly. It comes from a lifetime of hanging out with self-righteous hypocrites.
Once again you are showing your know-it-all attitude. Not knowing anything about the situation, you are making assertions as though you were totally immersed.
You are no better than the idiots I had to deal with for years, even though you are presenting yourself among us as a sweet-talking, all forgiving, "Jesus-like" saint.
Not forgiving someone and hating someone are two different things. It's interesting, but the people who have done the most harm to me, I have never felt hatred for. What I feel is a lack of any emotion for them, just distance. And they have never asked me for forgiveness. It is a stalemate situation that I have made peace with a long time ago.
In any case, how often does someone ever ask forgiveness of another person they have hurt? Most people are defensive and in denial about admitting they have ever hurt someone. The best way to deal with these things is to learn why this bad event happened to you and how to avoid another episode in the future. Forgiveness is not necessary when you learn to watch out for yourself. I'm not talking about becoming a bitter hermit, but just taking basic self-protective measures. The people we should forgive are ourselves for any self-blame and lack of awareness regarding our experiences. The person I mostly felt hatred for was for myself, but I have forgiven myself of all that--without god's help.
When I see one of those people of questionable sanity holding a sign that says "jesus loves you," I think to myself, "Well, I finally love me. I wish someone had told me to do that many years ago."
Got it.
Then, of the "true Christians™" who commit crimes, that number is actually very small.
Got that too.
Now, what exactly is that number? And what percent of "true Christians™" have committed a crime or two? And what's the percentage of "true Christians™" who have committed crimes yet never been caught, versus the "true Christians™" that have committed crimes and been caught?
All of us here who worked closely with him back then have been having a field day with this since the story broke about his little church in Fort Atkinson and his past as a sexual predator! We've even gone back and pulled his original files and found that he should have disclosed the 1989 conviction on his application with us (due to the nature of the job) but never did!
All any of us can say about him now that this story has come out is that we're really not overly surprised. Something just wasn't "right" about the man...I think it would be difficult to describe this "bad feeling" we had about him in a forum like this (too many examples would be needed) but we've all agreed that we hoped he wasn't "seriously deranged or dangerous" - at times, we would even feel guilty about some of the comments we would make about this guy behind his back...
But the biggest lesson that I believe we have all learned is when you get that odd feeling that "something just isn't right" about a person, it's probably best that you don't ignore that feeling.
The reason that I'm posting on here is to ask if some of you regulars really believe it's the institution of Christianity itself (or perhaps any organized religion) that actually "creates" this sort of person?
My opinion is that the "deviant" simply seeks out the "safe harbor" they feel religions offer them...I don't think I believe that the religion causes their deviance.
(and I also consider myself to be a "recovering" or exChristian)
This "Old Catholic Church of America" is chuck-full of fruits & nuts. Another of their "clergy", James L. Shinkle, was charged with 2nd Degree Sex Assault of a Child (felony), but was reduced to 4th Degree Sex Assault (misd.). (WI Circuit Court) He was employed at the St. Charles Juvenile youth facility where he met a young teenage boy and got sexually involved with him.
T. Andrew Lieving, ordained a deacon by this "church", sits in the Fox Lake Correctional Inst. and has a rather long list of aliases for one who is supposed to be a religious figure. (vinelink.com) He's also got a long "rap-sheet" for Forgery and Fraud charges/convictions. (WI Circuit Court)
How could I possibly know all of this? I almost got involved with this flaky group, but I thank God I went with my gut instinct about these people and stayed the hell away!
It is not God who is letting or causing bad things to happen. God gave each and every one of us Free Will. We have to choose what we do, when we do it and so on. You can yell and gripe about how God let you down, or how God didn't answer your prayers or how He failed you and others all day long but the fact is we are the ones who have failed Him and each other. If any of you read and truly understood the Bible you would know this! God gives us all free will, we choose what we do and when we die He will choose where we go! Repent, read your bible and most of all quit judging people It is not your Job, Nor mine. May each of you turn to the Lord before it is too late. May God Bless you all.
I assume you are presupposing that the Abrahamic God Jehovah is the one true deity out of the thousands of gods worshiped by people over the last several thousand years.
How is that you are so convinced that your deity exists and that your deity is the only one true deity?
Thanks.
I was about to write a reply to your post, then I noticed that the webmaster asked you several concise and fundamental questions. I'm curious to hear your answers to those too, so I'll wait to read your reply before chiming in. Take care.
(FYI: most everyone here has read/studied the Bible.)
"(FYI: most everyone here has read/studied the Bible.)"
Hi Jim,
I haven't yet got to look back at your old posts, but it seems your return has made at least a few members a bit pleased, to say the least.
I'm sure we can use your inputs!!
I find it most interesting how when a newbie strolls in here, they just assume we know nothing about their cherished bible and proceed to 'inform' of us of their grand knowledge of it.
Obviously they never take the time to realize that most folks here were once xtians and if they read a bit more, would realize we know their book quite well. In fact, I dare say better than most xtians do.
But I suppose this new person Jean is right and all we need do is REPENT and OMG, we'll all be saved.
Perhaps Jean can have a REPENT PARTY for all of us. I'm sure her god will show up for such an important event and we'll all get to meet this great god of hers.
Jean,
Actually we don't blame your god for human error. You can't blame a thing that doesn't exists, now can you.
AtheistToothFairy
Yes, I too am constantly amazed by the assumptions that visiting Christians make. As we do not share their cherished (yet unexamined) beliefs, it must be because
1) We are ignorant of them, or
2) We are mad at god, or
3) We've been deceived by humans and/or religion (as opposed to god), or
4) We are evil, possessed, lazy, stupid, prideful, etc.
The one explanation that would never occur to them, it seems, is that we have carefully and rationally examined their beliefs and rejected them as fictitious. Somehow, it simply cannot be that we disagree with them! That's why a favorite question of mine is to ask whether they agree that an educated, rational, and honest person could be fully aware of their religion and reach a different conclusion than they (i.e. that it is not the "one true religion"). Mostly I get no answer to that question when I put it to visiting Christians. That perplexes me. I just can't imagine how anyone can be so insular in their thinking. But I keep trying to figure it out... The brain is a marvelous thing; even when one decides to feed it a steady diet of nonsense.
Jean, if you are reading this, please add my question above to your list. I'd be curious to hear your response to that too. By the way, feel free to ask any questions you like. I'm always happy to answer questions. (Another thing that perplexes me about visiting Christians is just how incurious most of them tend to be. That should not surprise me by now, but it always does.)