MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL -- American’s increasing acceptance of religious diversity doesn’t extend to those who don’t believe in a god, according to a national survey by researchers in the University of Minnesota’s department of sociology.
From a telephone sampling of more than 2,000 households, university researchers found that Americans rate atheists below Muslims, recent immigrants, gays and lesbians and other minority groups in “sharing their vision of American society.” Atheists are also the minority group most Americans are least willing to allow their children to marry.
Even though atheists are few in number, not formally organized and relatively hard to publicly identify, they are seen as a threat to the American way of life by a large portion of the American public. “Atheists, who account for about 3 percent of the U.S. population, offer a glaring exception to the rule of increasing social tolerance over the last 30 years,” says Penny Edgell, associate sociology professor and the study’s lead researcher.
Edgell also argues that today’s atheists play the role that Catholics, Jews and communists have played in the past—they offer a symbolic moral boundary to membership in American society. “It seems most Americans believe that diversity is fine, as long as every one shares a common ‘core’ of values that make them trustworthy—and in America, that ‘core’ has historically been religious,” says Edgell. Many of the study’s respondents associated atheism with an array of moral indiscretions ranging from criminal behavior to rampant materialism and cultural elitism.
Edgell believes a fear of moral decline and resulting social disorder is behind the findings. “Americans believe they share more than rules and procedures with their fellow citizens—they share an understanding of right and wrong,” she said. “Our findings seem to rest on a view of atheists as self-interested individuals who are not concerned with the common good.”
The researchers also found acceptance or rejection of atheists is related not only to personal religiosity, but also to one’s exposure to diversity, education and political orientation—with more educated, East and West Coast Americans more accepting of atheists than their Midwestern counterparts.
The study is co-authored by assistant professor Joseph Gerteis and associate professor Doug Hartmann. It’s the first in a series of national studies conducted the American Mosaic Project, a three-year project funded by the Minneapolis-based David Edelstein Family Foundation that looks at race, religion and cultural diversity in the contemporary United States. The study will appear in the April issue of the American Sociological Review.
link
Why are you so impressed by the comparison of you with those unrelated and innocent groups-recent immigrants, gays and lesbians?
It's so shocking to you, huh? So do you, atheists, think that it is normal that you should be regarded more favorable over those groups? On what bases?
Who's shocked?
The article is pretty straight forward. Nobody has claimed any of what you are suggesting.
I used to sit in church(self-righteously) many many years ago and think, how could anyone be so lowly as to think oneself as an Atheist? I was wondering how could anyone bring themselves to openly reject God? This to me was admitted hatred of God. I used to think, How could anyone in their right mind, give up the free gift of Heaven or even remotely take a chance of going to Hell? I used to think(self-righteously), that Atheists were totally barbarians, with no respect for themselves nor any especially for Christians, and that Atheists no doubt cursed God and Jesus and his creations with every breath and had absolutely no morals, nor a conscious, able to torture babies and slaughter people without one bit of remorse.
I now know better! And I do greatly apologize for being so blatantly ignorant.
I know through the observations and actions of Christians, that there could not possibly be a Heaven or Hell. I also know by reading the Bible, there cannot be a God as described in the Bible.
For the most part Atheists do not Hate God or Jesus in any way, mainly because we do not believe that they exist and there is nothing to hate. It's impossible to hate something that does not exist, try it sometime. It's also impossible to Love something thats does not exist.
A christian may Love the religious concept of a God and Jesus, but thats all there is to love, the religious concept.
America changed 514 years ago, when the pirates brought over with them Bible, yes Christopher Columbus was a pirate, he is made out to be a hero, but actually he was a pirate, do some research.
American progress, yes we have Airplanes, Autos, etc. with so many conveniences we need not take over 100 steps a day to accomplish most of our daily tasks, but this land was stolen from the Native Americans, millions of Indians were killed and slaughtered in the name of God and Jesus, Christianity itself is barbaric, and has blood on it's hands.
Jesus said, go unto all the nations and teach the gospels and kill anyone that gets in your way.
No, he did not say kill, but that is just what happened, and if he was God, then he must have surely known that many people would die, for that stupid belief that Paul invented.
If I could turn the clock back and give it all back to the Indians, I would, what do we have today? A society based on greed with a 2000 year old religion controlling 97% of peoples minds, so damn depressing.
I am now proud to admit that I am an Atheist, and not associated with any religion.
Since most, if not all Christians have the wrong understanding of the label Atheist, I now label myself as a Confirmed Non-believer and Rationalist.
The only thing that Atheists hate, is total blissful ignorance, that one must profess to be a Christian or Muslim or Jew, etc.
I do experience more backlash at work than my muslim couterparts. For some reason, they call me a Jew for not following Christianity.
Don't forget the pirate, Chris Columbus, also brought over some of the first slaves.
I used to work with a catholic guy, and no matter how many times I told him that I was an Agnostic because I did not know what God was, he would always say "You don't believe in God. You are an Atheist" He always called me a Nazi.
I would tell him again, that it was just that, I didn't know if there was a God, because I didn't know what God was, and neither did anyone else, but he never would accept that.
Dan (Rationalist)
By the way...it's the same in Canada. The Canadians are way more easygoing with religion.
And I also wonder who was really behind this survey and how it was worded.
It all boils down to lies spouted by so called religious leaders of all denominations. They repeat over and over that athiests are devil worshippers, hate gawd, have no morals, etc, etc. The sheep believe everything they hear from their preachers and get completely brainwashed.
Regards, carol
I'd like to add a couple of my own.
First, there are a way too many things wrong with this survey. When your sampling percentage is extremely low (200,000,000 adults in USA but only 2,000 surveyed: .001%!) you cannot claim to have shown anything statistically.
Second, it is already a known fact that probably around 80% of America would consider themselves a Christian/Catholic/Muslim/religious in some way so assuming that we even go with the 2000 surveyed, we already know that the number of religious adherents would be approximately 1600 IF the sampling was truly random. If they called mostly the midwest and south, you might find the % is way off, say 1900 religious or even ALL!
Third, atheists already know that Christians would not trust them. This is not news.
I agree with those who said that the simpleminded, prejudiced, and fearful are always going to distrust those who are different.
tim
Christianity is the single largest hate group in the world.
This doesn't appear to be a completely random survey, and a cohort of only 2000 households of a potential population of millions of households gives the results little statistical power, and less credibility.
Still, I'm not too surprised at the results. People of a religous background, whatever the stripe, still hold that their supreme being is the origin of moral uprightedness. It is difficult for such people to accept the truth, that basic goodness has nothing to do with belief in any god.
I've suggested to the CNN Website that they have a poll asking "should Atheists be stripped of their citizenship," or "should atheists be allowed to have citizenship in the United States."
I thing the results would be interesting.
You would be suprised how many surveys are less than 5,000 people, including a lot of Gallop polls [so my professor says]. It is hard to have 20,000 results.
A philosphy of statistics course informed me that when you have a huge geographic area and a huge population, a small sample is acceptable.
I do not remember the test name or the formula for determining this. Ask your local doctorate of statistics.
Throw something a little wild out here... this came up in political science... since a lot of states have documented evidence their criminal code was based on the Ten Commandments, and the Ten Commandments have now been thrown out of the courts, who will be the first to commit murder and say that murder is okay because it was based on the Ten Commandments and it has now been thrown out... so murder has been thrown out as wrong.
Teeter
May I ask you a question? How are you so sure that there is no god. I think I understand well the position of agnostics. But I am curious about your conviction of no god. Anybody tell me?
Firstly, Atheism is not a "conviction", so right out of the gate, you are misinformed. Atheism is merely the non-belief in God(s). We could say that Atheism is the "default" position, that is, UNTIL adaquate objective evidence for the existance of such a being is put forth BY the one making the claim(in this case, you, I presume).
More over, I assume that you either have this evidence---in which case we'd love to hear it---or, that you take your belief on "faith"(like the bible SAYS you should.) Notwithstanding, in the words of Dan Barker, "Faith" is nothing more than a form of Agnosticism...i.e..."I can't prove the existance of God, so in turn, I can't KNOW the existance of God, yet, I have Faith that there is one." Conversley, if you have said "evidence", then "faith" is out the window, and vica verca. Got it? 'Glad I could help.
Good reply.
There are so many reasons not to believe that gods exist that it's really hard to list them all in a small forum post.
If a person is raised believing in such and such then they tend to take it for granted as being true. Now if this such and such happens to be a dogmatic religion such as Christianity or Islam, common sense, rationality, logic, etc., all go out the window.
If I had been raised as an atheist then I would tend to think atheism was true without even investigating religious claims.
The difference is a willingness to examine the evidence presented by any particular argument. Christians are not willing to do this. Muslims will kill you if you draw a picture of Mohammed. I shudder to think what they would do to a person if they drew a picture of Allah.
With this kind of close-mindedness, it is easy to clean to a believe that has no evidence or practically none while simultaneously rejecting a position that has a ton of evidence to support it.
Why don't I believe any gods exist, anonymous? I have yet to see any evidence presented in support of any god or gods that couldn't be explained in a naturalistic fashion. When is the last time you saw a true miracle? Has any of the faith healers restored an amputee's limb? Has Benni Hinn (sp?) ever brought anyone back to life?
I could go on and on about the negative evidence or lack of evidence for gods but let me ask you to present one piece of evidence that you think supports the idea of an almighty deity.
The chances are you are going to post something that to you seems to point to a god but under closer examination it will be revealed that you are simply ignorant of the facts surrounding your point. Go Google "intelligent design", print off some arguments by Behe and Dimbski and... feel good that these Ph.D.ed scholars believe in a god so there must be one since they are smarter than you, THEN come back here and we can discuss why each of their points fail. :)
I won't hold my breath.
Tim
What the hell? why is faith and theism given such privelage? whilst we , the faithless get looked down upon so greatly! It truly is sad?
I used to be a Thiest, a dedicated evangelical christian-for years, I too was prejudiced about theism and it's faithless counterparts.
The world needs to wake up and small the coffee man.
In Reason:
The very irreverand Bill "Iconoclastithon" Baker
It's just the fundy propaganda machine spreading lies.
Yeah, the catholic church, which if I am not mistaken, is the largest christian group in america, is a shining example of trustworthiness. What a bunch of tripe.
I don't agree that religion is the right "core" value/symbol to unite a nation, but it appears to be the one currently displayed, and used to hire employees, rally political support, etc.
A nation needs a face, what that face should be, appears to be lost to the leaders, of a diverse nation. Historically, a nation must find some element that all citrizens can agree upon, and then be considered 'one of us'. Unfortunately, it appears that "god" has been used as that element, and the catholic religion vying to put god in the pledge of allegiance is part of that forcing citizenship to rest on god as a common symbol.
What could be a nations' common core value? Perhaps, some nations' just need a face lift. Its not the beauty within, that appears to be the issue, its what is perceived on the outside many times. Perception is reality for many. I'd prefer to see a non-religious core value, focused on peace, environment, etc., however, it appears that the "god" supporters don't want to devalue their symbol, even though it is not accepted by the majority as a legitimate symbol for the whole.
"God is an Atheist"
--
Michelle,
While your statement made me laugh, it's possible that god isn't really an atheist per se.
How so, you ask.
Because it seems there is some god-like-force above him that stops him from making his own decisions when it comes to us humans.
He obviously was told by his 'boss' that he had only ONE shot at creating his human pets, Adam and Eve. After he saw he created a sinful flawed pair of humans, it was too late to start over again.
Also, if god was really in charge of everything here on earth, why would he wait a few thousand years before sending his 'son' down here to rectify the original sin problem?
The answer must be that god's boss had to be persuaded to give god's human pets another chance and that takes a lot of coaxing time I guess.
I'm also guessing that his boss will no longer allow him to 'play' with his human pets, as he's been all too silent for 2000 years now.
Good thing most of his pets know how to feed themselves, or they might starve to death waiting for the divine dinner plate to arrive.
ATF (who thinks the human god needs to find a new boss to work for)